One man’s opinion…


Please take into consideration before reading this; you may disagree entirely with what I am about to write. All I ask is that you hear me out and read and digest what I am suggesting.

So, as the world seemingly heads down the toilet taking all who reside here with it, I wonder what the ratio is of human beings that is, who actually realise what is happening to those who are totally oblivious? This is without doubt an impossible thing to deduce, unless you look at the logical factor involved. The fact we are still spiraling downwards ever seemingly on a path that will result in total destruction. By using this simple logic it is more than certain that the ratio is un-healthily balanced on the side of the oblivious. In all honesty though is this, such a bad thing if the only solution that could work needs this to work? An interesting conundrum indeed that calls for four elements to be talked about, although many cannot be bothered through simple applied apathy resulting from complete non-interest and the rest… well let us talk of this.

It seems to me, although I could be very wrong about this, there are four categories human beings can be placed in. Although called by different names across the world I will use how I term them world wide, you can apply your own regional names, but they still amount to the same.

The groups/categories are as follows.

  1. Monarchists
  2. Parliamentarians
  3. Non-conformists
  4. The Apathetic

To be honest I have approached one of these subjects once at a talk I did in Leicester some years back and I was met with a torrent of abuse and for the first time peer pressure was washed to the side as they fought for their say on the matter. What I approached was Monarchy without a perspective of my own I just threw this as bate and oh boy did they bite that bate. I found this most interesting as all four elements where present in the room described above. The devoutly political (democracy is the only way through debate), the devoutly royalist (albeit for the wrong reasons in my view) the non-conformist (who want no rules whatsoever and just want to be able to do as they please) and of course the apathetic (who basically don’t give a shit). I stood there silent and just listened and was to say the least amazed at the aggression (said to be passion) that was on display regarding the mention of the subject matter. Then they turned on each other when their conflicting opinions did not match and it took some time for this to calm, but eventually I could speak again and carry on.

On that day I didn’t really know what I’d un-covered to be honest, until much later on when I was reflecting on what had happened, which is actually whilst I am writing this. I know that sounds strange, but that is how I write – of the ‘moment’ some say… I would like the chance to explore this again and will have through the new talk I am doing, but this time I would like to add a perspective of my own – should prove interesting and something I am about to explore within this article/blog. Please be aware though I find it difficult to explain myself with words written and find it far easier when I can do it vocally, but I will try to get my perspective across nonetheless.

So lets step back in history for a minute and explore what created such concepts as monarchy, parliament, non-conformity and last but not least apathy. Well the simple truth regarding three of them is that they were simply an idea at one time that received agreement and is it not the ‘agreement’ that is the most powerful aspect. The other one is generated from the lack of understanding or simply because lack of interest is created via helplessness, hope or distraction. Three elements have the indoctrinated in them, who cannot see past their own noses as all perceptions they have are marred by belief in that element. So are the apathetic just as indoctrinated? Well the answer can only be yes as they believe or have accepted that life cannot be any different, absorbed by all the distractions life presents as it is. Purposely it would seem, if you look through the eye’s that suggest someone could of course benefit from this, which is without doubt shrouded behind a label called ‘conspiracy theory’ that hides the true intent. Another ‘buzz’ word that creates a separation and a turn off switch within the receptors of life in decadence, who cannot plainly see that what this results in is the rich get richer and the poor get poorer and those in between don’t give a shit until poverty comes a knocking on their door.

So has it always been this way? Well yes it has, with the world revolving around a monumental worldwide ‘pyramid’ scheme, which maintains the separation exists. Master slave syndrome or god complex that exists through position or class division deriving from the belief that something can be lesser than you and because of this, the higher up you become, the more you can demand serve you and your self interest. All four elements in one way or another are affected by this, even though the way it is demonstrated is slightly different, but the essence of problem is the core that drives this obsessive need to better one’s self, which is propagated daily through the media, education (children and adult) and parents. Sorry I am distracting from the essence of what I am talking about, but I am sure you will agree/disagree that these elements exist.

So let’s look at the groups/categories in more detail, albeit very brief descriptions and in some ways a little bias – but opinions are like arseholes we all have one!

Monarchists. This is an interesting group that have been labeled Royalists in history and it is suggested they serve the needs of a king or queen and feel that they should be the ultimate point of power. Monarchy actually means ‘central point of administration of law’, so it is interesting that even though they may not know this, they recognise the essence of a king or queen being that point of power. Unfortunately they do not recognise that no king or queen has ever done their job properly and they are quite happy for them to sit in grandeur above the rest of the people – a loyalty that is quite misplaced. But they are happy to be subjects and subjected to the whims of a human being who believes they have some kind of divine rite. Also this is a breeding ground for ‘nationalism’… I will come back to this directly.

Parliamentarians. This is a group of individuals who believe in the power of debate (essentially arguments) and that those arguments are settled by the majority vote. Shame it is not realised that this allows for the wrong thing to happen, if the wrong thing gets the majority! – Or is this very much relied upon in the rich rich, poor poor syndrome (god complex) that created it in the first place? They believe the people’s power should be invested in an assembly of men (now also women) and not just in one, although their assumed power derives from that one position. Under what they call the ‘mandate of the people’ that is created via elections (a process nepotism can hide behind and to elude to there being some form of choice) they derive policy for the political regime they create and control in the name of the monarch. In essence they take on the role of Monarchy as being the central point of administration of law and the true monarch is legally castrated to prevent this from occurring. They may express disapproval, they may give a warning and they most certainly have the right to be informed (within reason that is) but without the will of the people lost in apathy and stolen by parliament there is nothing they can do. Another trick they can use is to pass a bill and modify it if it is called for by the monarch under warning, pass it and then add to it, modify it and enact each part under statutory instrument without the monarch even knowing. Basically they are self-important, self-serving parasites bleeding the people dry (well certain elements whereas others have a protection) under the illusion that is representation and law. Moreover this is another breeding ground for ‘nationalism’… again I will get back to this directly.

Non-conformist. Another very interesting group deriving from the need to go against conforming to what they believe is wrong. Mainly known for their denial of the recognised church, but also for their refusal to accept repugnant laws (their words not mine) be that from a king or queen or a parliament of liars. (Sorry couldn’t help myself, but nonetheless true… how did your dad come about that 30 mil Dave?) Nowadays that has manifested into a group of people who call themselves ‘freemen’ who would like no rules at all – a nice sentiment indeed although, at this moment not a very practical one. I was labeled one of these for a while and still am, all to do with my affidavits I served on Elizabeth the CEO of UKPLC but that story is for another time and possibly might be something I talk about in the talks. And it is not in context regarding the subject matter of this article…

The apathetic. This group makes up the majority by all accounts. They are the downtrodden element the rest rely on for their existence. Without their apathy none of the above would exist, as they are the engine that drives the commercial machine (religious and political that are in fact one and the same) the rest cannot be without for the benefits they claim whether that is by privilege or necessity and to do the jobs that keep the machine running effortlessly. Without them it stalls and that is why they are kept in the daily struggle that is life, so they don’t question and obey without exception. This group, in essence are the most powerful, even though they are very unaware of this fact, even though to many of us it is obvious why this has been deliberately done, as in essence their power is most certainly recognised and feared. They have been divided through history, racism (but it is the human race, is it not and not the human races?) religious and political segregation, nationalism, wealth, style, fashion, trend, technology, class, position, status, and education… too many to mention, but by that little lot you get my point. Maybe they just need reminding of this and reminding of what power they really hold and of course how to wield it  – correctly that is. For one minute realise the power of what it means to be a ‘consumer’ and the power of one action ‘to depose’!

So now I have separated the four different groups we now have to bring them together, so we can try to advert the destruction that is most certainly looming over us all. This to many is an unthinkable challenge that results in another form of apathetic approach when it is presented in real terms and of course you must get past the ‘nationalistic’ approach, which creates a most powerful divide, up there with religion. Nationalism was ultimately designed to cause and re-enforce the concept of divide and rule via segregation and separation as who created it do very successfully. It works via pride in what is called ‘your country’ which is a political debtor’s open prison controlled by a devoutly insane political regime where you have no real freedom and no say in the rules forced upon you, but have liberty that they allow you to have via their policy. You are confined to an area of land that has been legally defined on a map and called a country and if you leave you will generally go to another prison with political rules. To do this you must be a good little serf and conform no matter how heinous the policy becomes and to look up to your masters and be thankful for the scraps you are thrown from their table of abundance. You must recognise they are better than you and in being so they have the ‘right’ (divine or political) to do this. If they say you must have pride in your country, then you must do so, even though in reality you must have pride in a political regime that takes your money and murders people in other countries with it, allows for poverty to still exist in this day and age and last but not least… I will leave this one for another time, as you probably have got the point I am making by now. If you haven’t well the point is nationalistic pride allows this to happen as it creates a point of segregation from the rest of the world, as religions create segregation from other religions. History re-enforces this notion and renews it through education processes, remembrance, monuments and statues that litter cities across the world, the media, documentaries about war, films about war, video games and of course books. This is then related to immigration through lack of jobs via political nationalist parties that segregate on two levels, the former and of course against other political parties.

What is forgotten is that the earth doesn’t belong to any one institution, organization, or even us individually, it actually belongs to no one, and we all should inhabit the earth equally really, or we should do! What has obviously occurred is that areas have been claimed under assumed ownership by empirical enforcement, which then created a divvy up of the land mass under what is known as ‘legal ownership’ primarily done by the devoutly insane under a god complex. (monarchies and parliamentarians) So it seems obvious to me that to bring about a reversal of this process you first must eradicate the god complex and devoutly insane legal system built from it. Once this is achieved it would be possible to unite the human race and please note I said ‘race’ and not ‘races’! It is not right to be abusive full stop let alone use the colour of some ones skin within an insult (mental abuse) but it has to be recognised that this does only work one way for a very specific reason. Again it causes anger and a point, nationalism can rise from within that anger that leads to a nationalist mindset. In reality it is impossible to be racist as there is only ‘the human race’ and we are not called ‘the human races’ thus you simply cannot be racist if only one exists. This alone demonstrates what twoddle the legal systems of the world are and in reality provides ample evidence of why such in accuracies exist and clearly for what purpose. Please, don’t use the colour of someone’s skin against them in an insult; in fact don’t insult anyone at all if you can help it. It is not big and it is not clever and it is not nice, so stop it and stop the legal systems making money off of your stupidity. Also, don’t confuse being told the truth and being insulted, because they are distinctly different and ultimately done for completely different reasons, but sometimes seem so similar, it does add to confusion.

So back to history for a second, religion and politics have been at the helm of things for little over two thousand years and nothing has ever changed except get worse (I commented on this fact in another article/blog recently) and still the monarchist’ and the parliamentarians want to do more of the same. The devoutly insane are the same and still feel that reliance on ‘books’ (doesn’t matter what religion your talking about here) is the way forward. The foundation of these concepts (monarchy and parliamentarians) are you will find the god complex instigated by the devoutly insane, even the fact that the concept of ‘divine rite’ comes directly from the god complex. The workings of the parliamentarians are exactly that of the church, as the oppressive law they force upon the people is Cannon Law, or church law derived directly from their religious book ‘the bible’, which in reality is, in my opinion, a fictitious storybook. The contributing factor to take into account within this is that this storybook is the foundation of law that allows the people to do the heinous things they have done in the name of a fictitious character in a book you cannot question. I am sorry but that to me is a little too convenient when you fully appreciate what has been built from this and how it affects us everyday.

For their law to work properly under the god complex someone upon the earth must be seen as the highest representative of the that god. In this case it is the queen and everyone else falls into line under her. Now lets say just for one minute that was the case and the queen had overall power, or lets say she was ‘deposed’ and who replaced her did. (And because it is a man’s world they would almost certainly have to be a man, even though, again in my opinion, more women need to hold positions of responsibility – another story for another time) Now they hold the ultimate point of power (the central point of administration of law) and for many (relying on historic records) this would be a very bad thing to happen, but we have to look at the optimistic view point as well as the pessimistic one. If this did in fact happen with the right king on the throne, then everything under that position would change as well by default. If that king decided to create a kingdom based on equality no one could stop him doing it. If he decided to erase status, position and standing and the privileges gained from these positions, again no one could stop him. If he decided to re-distribute the wealth and eradicate poverty and give everything that could be given for free, actually for free no one could stop him. All that fall under his power would have to do as he say’s and they could not argue. In essence no one could stop him putting things right and no one could stop him eradicating the god complex that is responsible for the problems we now live in daily. In essence it would be the case of using the god complex against itself.

So the new king would need a group under him to help ‘him’ run the kingdom and one already exists, so why not use that one. (It makes compete sense to do so) It has a central point that can be used to a regional one and also a local one. All that has to be removed is the god complex and its influence. Just because they have always done the wrong thing, again doesn’t mean that can’t be directed to do the right thing. Of course in losing the god complex they would become an equal to everyone else and their wealth, as anyone’s would be re-distributed. They won’t like it, but if it is the law, then they have no choice. Thus, all the changes that are needed, to be applied and put in place can be via a process that everyone knows and recognises. All that has to happen is the new king directs without question what those changes have to be. Forming a kingdom based on equality eradicates the use of the god complex (The privileged) and with its eradication, segregation and separation through political, religious and social divides becomes a thing of the past lost in the past forever – the kick start our children need. Capitalism, monopolisation and corporate greed would become illegal as the whole legal systems do an about turn and revert back to a principle of equality and not equity. Of course there is a whole lot more to go in to regarding this subject, but by now I am sure you get the principle. Everyone, in one way or another, abides by the law daily. To make the changes needed, simply change the law. Make it law that you have to do the right thing as an equal on parity with every other living thing, on the principle of inhabitance and not ownership. To change law to such a degree you need the founding position of that law to change and that by default means only one position needs to change.

I know that many of you would find this suggestion quite alarming and I know you will express your concerns, which by default will cast yourselves into one of the four categories by your own comments. I understand this completely and have been at times where you are, trying to solve what would seem an un-solvable conundrum. All I suggest here is a simple idea, a notion of logical outcome that cannot be denied as the very opposite of what I suggest is the world we live in. If one side can exist and work, then by default the other side could exist and work.

If this were to happen then the four groups would be united in one common goal in the end, which is equality, as they would not have a choice as the law would dictate that this must be so. Human beings adapt very quickly to new surroundings, we know this from our own experiences life has thrown at us, so we could adapt to this. Yes a chance must be taken and yes it relies upon the will of one man, which to many is an un-thinkable thought. I suggest to you, from my heart this is possible and this can work, when you realise how much power you possess and realise how to use it. You are consumers and hold the power to bring anything ‘corporate’ to its knees and that means anything and all you have to do is ‘not buy their products’. No one can force you to buy anything. This is a freedom that can never be removed from you. Governments, companies and all things corporate (including the church) rely on you for their existence. If this is the case, which it cannot be denied it is, then realise who really holds the power. If you in this country decide to, you can demand a new king and new laws, because it is your will and your freedom of choice being a simple consumer that can bring this about. If the queen is not willing to listen, then she can be none violently ‘deposed’ and you as a people can chose your own king. Her government would lose its power in an instance and thus it would have to fall under the control of a new central point of administration of law. It is that simple!

This does not only effect here, this affects America and the rest of the common wealth and Europe. We are talking about creating a situation of equality across two thirds of the world’s population. For this reason alone that is why this island is so important. That it is why you as a people are feared so much. That is why we have to do this, not just for our children, but also for the children of the world. I call upon you to unite; I call upon you to unite together as a community to serve the world, as a community that will not tolerate war, poverty and the god complex any more. That will stand together side by side and say ‘no’ we will not live this way any longer. We will not let the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, this will end, as we will make it so. We are the people and we hold the power, a power in reality that can never be taken from us.

I know in my heart someone out there can do this and is the 'king' we seek and i will support them if they do what is right. If they don't, then I will be the first to voice objection as I am doing now and I will continue till the right man is found. As always this is just one mans opinion, nothing more, nothing less and please take it as only being that.   x

23 thoughts on “One man’s opinion…

  1. Interesting "opinion", Democracy is all about 51% taking the rights away from the 49% and by way of man made laws that can change as often as your socks, I agree with that much, But a new King? Your asking for more of the same! There are already a good set of laws you can live by (good for the present and future) and you dont need any religious official, councilor, magistrate (or king for that matter) as that is for the hypocrites.

    Your repeated antichristian rhetoric is well mixed with your anti government rhetoric, however a king will still want to govern! In his own way! Our present monarch is supposed to be impartial and neutral and we find out recently what alot of people already knew…..has alot of influence (she is a bussiness woman John), the officials work alongside a group of people that want to divide people further so they can accept the false peace that is around the corner, but this, like yours John is just my "opinion" .  look after yourself and dont join the dark side x

  2. You left out 'None of the above' I don't fit into any of the four. I believe that politics, monarchy and modern financial structures don't work, but a resource based economy would. the only problem with that, is actually getting the majority of the worlds population to believe it; and convincing them to let go of money once and for all. We really don't need it anymore it's an outmoded system that we have clung to out of habit without taking into consideration the advances of technology.

    Yes…I'm part of the Zeitgeist movement….And you said people may disagree with you!

  3. For all those that can not see beyond the existing system and its foundations that from what I have been able to discern stretch back to the beginnings of this epoch, that of the entity that is by its available record of the water and of a cold blooded species, a species that through its manifold forms now is more clearly evident to be a clear and imminent threat to not only man and woman kind, but to all other species. We thus stand on the edge of a precipitous and utterly lethal fork in our destinies.
    If we continue along the path forced by coercion, violence and adversarial doctrines then in the view of this writer, our children are doomed.
    As I walk amongst people and ask the unifying question as to their natural ways, there is one aspect that stands out so prominently that it holds perhaps one of the keys to a new and far more benevolent paradigm. We were told that we were driven from the garden and to an extent this is true, what we were not told was that we were not driven from it, just blinded from its blessings and driven into a form of so called civilization that has over its long held grip on our people both past and present.

    As abject slavery and the culling of vast numbers of our species is now visible on the near horizon, it is time to move our will away from the path of mutual destruction, away from the belief in mutual competition and towards surrendering our efforts to the repair and restoration of our home.

    The rhetoric of the present controlling powers that control through dark and subversive forces is evidently becoming more desperate on a daily basis. Many good and brave clear minded men and women have already taken a stand against its draconian impositions and have suffered greatly, myself included.

    We are now in the midst of what may end up as being one of the cruelest of winters and a spring will be yearned for. Now is the time to remember and bring the return of the only compass of significance, the only direction where our descendants will even have the opportunity of celebrating each of our humble actions against this demonic creed.

    The serpant has now entwined itself around our planet and is about to unleash the most vile of plans. This we who remember and still hold the utmost respect of our ancestral origins are bound to act against.

    If such a man or woman exists that can remain devoid of the corruption and temptations that supreme power brings, then I would willingly transfer my own humble allegiance to them. For me, the hour is late and I have and see too many victims of the machine.

    From my own studies, I see only a few occasions where the role of benign dictators have succeeded, the most recent being that of Libya and it Green Book. Of course I did not live through that regime, but hold as significant the perception that tnose controling entities had to destroy it, before its proven successes became widely known.

    It is certainly for me, time to move and do so with all speed.

    Life is not supposed to be easy, it requires a constant and determined effort, this regardless of the structure of society. But the existing despotism and corruptions I for one can tolerate no more.

     

  4. With great respect John, Why would we suddenly be allowed to vote for our own Monarch of choice by the powers that be? Why would he be allowed to make all the decisions? I guess you're convinced that the present monarch holds all the power?   
    I don't myself believe that it's the god complex perse to blame, because there are people who believe in God but not the kind they've been told to believe in, the corporate kind, especially not in an unquestioning way. It is true that many atrocities have been committed in the name of God, but equally there have been crimes committed in the name of the greatest good for all, for instance industrialisation was NOT particularly carried out in God's name, but rather simply in the name of increased productivity and progress, a corporate policy that was portrayed as desirable and good, but it was in fact an excuse and decoy to get people off the land and it was brutal. Now there's Agenda 21, carbon emission reductions, population control, which is in the name of saving the earth and enabling human survival in general allegedly, NOT directly God as such as he is commonly known/perceived. God directly is never mentioned, although I suppose nature or earth/gaia worship must in John's opinion be another form of the god-complex, as is the whole political paradigm: Individual humans are in essence constantly prepared to sacrifice themselves in the name of the greater good of the community at large or gaia- same difference. Humans must learn to realise that they are no greater than anyone or anything else and no lesser. Yes Satan is mistaken for God in our, in my opinion 'god forsaken' or if you like John, 'god-complex' society- same difference lol. However slavery is mistaken for freedom also, and lies for truth, and bad for good, the list of mistaken meanings, diametrically opposed and reversed and corrupted goes on. I guess you could say also that we live in a 'word-complex' society however I don't think we can get rid of words anymore than we can get rid of any notion of God. I suppose there's a subtle difference between getting rid of any notion of God and the God-complex? Perhaps gradually step by step we will be able to get rid of all the word and God paraphernalia and get back to life in paradise?

  5. All the 'remembering" that John Harris has been mentioning, and 'getting back' to somewhere, some place some time long ago when we were whole ([paradise), when we were better, or even entirely good, reminds me so much of the ending of T.S.Eliot's Four Quartets. I recommend reading the entire poem actually, it's all about the notion of getting beyond duality, beyond the entrapments and falsehoods of deceptive words, to find just the right words that truly communicate reality or truth or love or that engender 'real eyes' (realisation) in everyone or at least most or enough people- and it's not just the words, it's the the precise, exact way they're put together, and the resulting frequency as it were, the resonance, or as John says also the way they are spoken, cause in his opinion I guess words are ideally spoken rather than written and read, because then they are more alive than dead 😉 (this even rhymes lol) :

    "We shall not cease from exploration
    And the end of all our exploring
    Will be to arrive where we started
    And know the place for the first time.
    Through the unknown, unremembered gate
    When the last of earth left to discover
    Is that which was the beginning;
    At the source of the longest river
    The voice of the hidden waterfall
    And the children in the apple-tree
    Not known, because not looked for
    But heard, half-heard, in the stillness
    Between two waves of the sea.
    Quick now, here, now, always—
    A condition of complete simplicity
    (Costing not less than everything)"

  6. In a perfect world, this would be the norm and most likely already in place.

    Unfortunately, You and I both know that ALL attempts at this fundamental change would be JFK'ed in a heartbeat.

    Great read nonetheless.

    Regards,
    Bones

  7. The intelligence of the contributors to this discussion leaves me humbled . The Golden Rule strongly influences my own personal ethics i.e. Never , intentionally , cause another human being loss or harm …….. Simple , yet productive . The moment constantly evokes reactions . Opinions change . Can there be any one singular answer to an individual's questions if there is no greater natural source ?

    One love .

  8. I can see  where you're coming from John and agree that the idea is a simple one. The fact is that to fix the problem IS simple, with the right person making the law. Our world has been made complicated and so the idea of simplicity is lost on all but a few it seems.

    I must admit that I've never considered that I could accept the notion of a King being someone that I could have faith in to "do the right thing" by the people but, the qualities outlined in your article would probably do it for me.

    I think it's important that, to promote the reality of equality, it has to come from fact and common sense and, presented as such and, presented simply. It doesn't matter about the "yeah buts" so long as the foundation is solid. There are so many that benefit from the promotion of complexity at the expense of ordinary people that the ordinary man and woman need a simple response to those complexity arguments of the "authority".

    In my view, simplicity regarding the law is possible too. You initially look at what affects the health and well being common to ALL OF US and protect it lawfully FOR EVER. For example we all need clean air, clean drinking water, good quality food, and shelter. These are the very basic requirements for good physical health and should be the foundation on which all other laws are measured. Take air travel for instance it should be outlawed until such time as a clean non polluting source of fuel is developed. If it's "inconvenient" TOUGH! If businesses will fold TOUGH! It's tough because it harms our fundamental right to live without pollution created for the profit or convenience of the few at the expense of the many.

    There's loads more to say about this than I can be arsed to write about right now … but I will be asking you to speak more about this topic when you come to Leicester tomorrow. 😉

  9. 1st'ly I can't wait to read the comments above/below mine… I can only take in 'so' much information at a time, so will read those another time.

    2nd'ly Objectivity John, you mention Pride in terms of regions (I dislike patriotism at the best of times), to eliminate it, rub out the imaginary lines on a map… fair enough, but how do you un-brain wash people out of religion? I'd really like to know this, not been sarcastic, really I would. If you think of the wars, murders and general hatred derived from religion and try to comprehend this over all the ages, it makes me severely depressed. Buddhism is not a religion, there is no God or 'higher power' (well there is sort of a higher power in Buddhism but it teaches you that this higher power is literally in everything and everyone), there is no right or wrong, up or down, left or right. It teaches only compassion and enlightenment (to me they are the same thing) but not many people care, the 'right' one is there in front of them almost everyone has heard of Buddhism but they cling to ‘theirs’, boy do people cling to religion.

    3rd'ly There is not just one out there that can fit the mould for your idea of a true leader (I'd like to think I could), I think there are many. They are the ones who would agree with all you say but if were asked “you lead” would say “no, I couldn’t do it” but inside would want nothing less than to play any significant role to better the lives of everyone. The one it will end up being is anyone of the many, who is handed the ‘job’ (without trying for it) and told “do it, you/we don’t have a choice” – This interlinks with your four categories, so it does. The Apathetic group, applied with the theory (quote) “It's only on the brink that people find the will to change. Only at the precipice do we evolve.” Only once they has sucked us dry, will something change…

    KEEP WRITING JOHN – LOTS OF US NEED THIS

  10. Well, I've changed my mind, there isn't a King out there. There can't be.

    Oooh, what have I just said! 😀

    Is there anyone out there that is so impartial that he would give up his own life to save another? If he was SO important to mankind would his death have a negative effect? What then?

    No, there is no King out there. Sorry.

    But, what about inside? Don't people always say "look inside"?

    Inside each and everyone of us there is a system or process that works showing by us what is positive and what is negative. It is hard wired, it is part of what we are and, it cannot EVER be corrupted. It works the exact same way in each of us and so what it shows one of us, we can safely assume it will show others. I say it cannot be corrupted and it can't, but when our actions are contrary to what we recieve, then the unresolved contradiction produces mental stress, angsiety, depression and, confusion.

    Isn't that the state of the world today?

    By contradicting the "King's" advice, we suffer (negative).

    By personally chosing to follow the Kings word, your personal world, as if by magic, becomes much better. Disputes are settled in the correct manner, though not always in your favour, but justly.

    I'm pissing about with words and you could be forgiven for thinking that this is some sort of religious rant. It is not! Though I do suspect this is what they may have been talking about oh so poetically.

    I'll nutshell it.

    Nature exists and so can be catagorised as "positive".
    We're part of nature and not separate from it. Can we say we "are" nature? Dunno.
    Nature is continuious and creates creatures that evolve into the future.
    We humans have evolved to where we are now.
    To get to where we are now we have avoided extinction (extinction being a negative).
    We have an hard wired internal system that when we give it data, produces sensations that we recognise as negative feelings and positive feelings. Our decisions are based upon this. The King has spoken. Eurika, enlightenment!!
    All we need do is, when we make our decisions make sure they are NOT contradictory … it WILL get easier, crosses fingers. 😉
    And for those of us looking at creating a better world, spotting and pointing out authorititive contradictions. I imagine it to be so much fun watching the tongue tied hypocrites squirm.
    This if acted on, cannot fail to produce the correct actions. Even if they're not predictable they will be correct.
    I imaging that having the key to correct answers would be advantagious and more poeple will want to know the secret. Ooh, errrr, where will it leave the hypocrites? 😀

    It really is down to the individual. No one is coming. The King lives in YOU, long live the King.

  11. I agree with all you have said I am also one of those who can vocalize better than type, my other problem is that my powers of argument or suggestion come to me slowly ( my mind works silently in the background then wakes me up all of a sudden with some form of answer).

    Is it possible that another factor is also in the mix? Equality for all is a great concept but

    I agree with all you have said I am also one of those who can vocalize better than type, my other problem is that my powers of argument or suggestion come to me slowly ( my mind works silently in the background then wakes me up all of a sudden with some form of answer).

    Is it possible that another factor is also in the mix? Equality for all is a great concept but someone always wants to be more equal than the rest. No religion, Government, Ideology, Monarchy really work for the betterment of the world, their main intention is Domination.

    Even if we had a system in place to ensure that everyone was given shelter, food, education, medical aid, etc., some deviate would be in the background trying to skim a little extra off the top. Our collective resources are being squandered at an alarming rate and could be saved if corporate greed was eliminated, many of our physical ailments are curable but for corporate greed.

    I have a bad feeling that none of the above mentioned groups will ever co-operate due to the reluctance to relinquish Power or control. Since the beginning of time domination has been the aim and all the religions have basically taught this but nothing has ever been updated. The world clings to outmoded indoctrinations, It is my opinion that “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” might be all that is required.

    I’m not sure whether my response is of any value but there it is

    1. Hello Nigel. I'm like you, writing is a pain in the arse! 😀

      I wanted to point out that I believe what you said about "equality" is NOT TRUE. Really it isn't. You called it a "concept" but it isn't. It's reality … and this is where all our answers lie.

      Something I've only just recently noticed is, that there has been a belief installed in the majority of the worlds population which divorces mankind from it's origines … NATURE.

      Don't we generally believe that we're separate from it?

      I believe that it started with religion. Look at Genisis and you'll see. Look at the definition of nature on dictionary.com.

      I'm still not 100% certain whether this is the great conspiracy or just the stupidness of early(er) man.

      Nature has a very simple code that we can recognise and use to our benifit that will limit the need for man made laws.

      Being divorced from nature and so that code means that man has to devise alternatives, which don't come close to what nature has created, or rather what nature is.

      My post above (no doubt inadequately) outlines the idea.

      Going back to equality, do you have a good argument against this:

       

      All human beings are a product of nature first and foremost. Is this true? I think it seems to be. There is no favouritism in nature. This I think is also true because, if nature decides that a foetus isn’t going to reach full term then it doesn’t, full stop. Meaning, if there is any abnormality during growth that is severe enough, the unborn baby will die before it is born … regardless of who it’s parents are and where on Earth they are!

       

      A baby that is born, whatever its measure of health, is born with no higher natural right to exist than the next baby. Both are EQUALLY entitled to life and both are EQUALLY entitled to exist, just by the very fact that they do exist. There is no distinction between the two. None.

      So seeing that nature produces live human beings without favouritism, it then follows that all human beings are born equal in all rights to life and all that life has to offer.

      We can shorten this to “all human beings are born equal”.

      I don't see that there's a rational argument against it. Saying we're not part of nature doesn't cut it either … the universe exists, nature exists, we exist, where is the boundary between the universe and nature? Where is the boundary between nature and human beings? If you can't contemplate the boundaries then, maybe there aren't any.

      Just because those that have control of the laws cannot (stupidity) or will not (conspiracy) take notice of the reality of equality, it doesn't mean that WE that know and understand of it's existance, cannot let it be known that we know by showing with our rational uncontradictory arguments. The absolute root of any argument against the oppressors MUST be the truth of equality and ANY "law" which violates that fundamental charicaristic of our nature must be considered NULL AND VOID or re-written, thus avoiding contradiction.

    2. This is part of the Christian lie: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”. It is self serving. Look closely at it, and reflect upon it. It teaches that One should do to others what you wish for yourself. It is not unconditional. If I want something, then I should do/give to another as a form of getting what I want. Not because it is decent and ethical do so, but because I want something from the action. And what if one is of a devious nature? A rapist who wants to violently engage in sexual deviance with a neighbour say! By that mantra, they should then go rape the neighbour, as they should "do unto others…"

       

      There was an older Gnostic teaching which appears to have be corrupted(inverted) to give us that later "Christianized" teaching. And it read: "Do NOT do unto another, that which you would not wish done unto yourself.."

  12. The people are fast asleep. They would come to this site in search of entertainment, and leave as soon as they could not find any. The populace have all been hypnotised, divided and conquered and would resist any attempts to awaken them to reality, even siding with the TPTB against any action taken against the status quo by the good,morally just, principled peoples here.

  13. So it's nationalism bad, internationalism good. It may be one human race but there are clearly distinct ethnic groups within it. The real diversity of the world that, if not worth preserving, then not worth having a sledge hammer taking to it. Ethnic groups the 'ruling elite' are doing their best to destroy. It seems you're only too happy to pour fuel on their fire.

    As for Canon law reflecting Biblical law it's clear you haven' read the Bible. Christianity isn't Catholicism. I'm surprised you haven't worked that out yet.

    Surely with your proposal of a new King we're replacing one 'god complex' with another. I'm all for an elected monarch but it should be one whose role is primarily to protect and support the constitution and the fundamentals contained within it. Anything else should be by direct democracy. Of course for this to function correctly we need a well educated and informed population.

    Incidentally if there are no nations then which nation is the King to rule over? Or is this just another of the many ruses being used to herd the masses towards the benevolent/good 'New World Order'? There are innumerable problems with a 'one size fits all' world government. Too many to mention. That's not what the PTB fear. What they fear is the lone nation that serves as an example to the rest. That's why 'nationalism' is derided. A good nation works in partnership with its neighbours to their mutual benefit. Nationalism and Christianity have long been the targets of the NWO. On reading this article I see nothing much has changed. The sun worshippers, it seems, have merely got another iron in the fire.

    One final point. An equality that has to be enforced is no equality at all. Apart from requiring a strong state to ensure that everything is equal, history has shown that what most often happens is that the lowest common denominator is sought. Equality before the law, equality of opportunity and an equal share of natural resources but after that the state (King) should have little or no influence. The ruling elites despise true capitalism (free markets) but this system offers the greatest choice, innovation and value for money when run correctly. What we have currently is a sort of monoploy capitalism/corporatism that is only possible due to the current banking/financial system. In short, sort that out and true capitalism would level itself out of its own accord. A very much greater reduction in inequality should be the goal not some artificial 'equality'. That's without even dealing with the free will/spiritual elements of all this. 

    Any way, a little food for thought. 

  14. It is not about electing or voting for a new sovereign or government, it is about accepting resbonsibility for yourself and not delegating your own power to another authority who then claims dominium over you. The problem is too many people do not want to take responsibility for their own actions, so when things go tits up they can blame some one else.The answer, as I see it, is the education system imposed by TPTB for their own ends to DUMB down the population, so, TPTB can feather their own nest at the expense of the masses. Take back your power by making your own decisions and learn the real 'LAW' not legalese as dictated by private corporations.Become MEN and WOMEN not 'persons' and treat all people as equals on the basis of flesh and blood.

  15. Heres my spin on all this. Just my view.

    This is a very good point indeed that John raises. This may explain why some people are indeed awake and some are still without being rude asleep.

    The only problem we are facing I see is this, I do not really like to talk about these things as It may give ideas but hey it has to be said. The way we are currently heading is an electronic world.

    Yes you may have heard of the old chestnut New world order, you may have even heard we will all be chipped. But have you actually thought for a minute that is not necessary. We are almost there people, call me a scarmongerer if you like but with FIAT currency going one way and we know where that is down. It will have to be replaced and that will most likely be electronic. Hell people can use their phones for transactions today, we have been given credit cards, debit cards, store cards and on and on. A nice way of getting you and me used to no more money. When that happens you are no longer a slave you are a robot. Imagine the outcome to this.

    You are then a robot or more of a slave if you want to use that word, to the banking system.

    Think all these years they have been collecting data on you, think of all the years they have been watching you ever more and more. Do you think they want to watch you so much because they have an interest in you or your wellbeing?

    Just go with me on this. 

    You happen to be a little obese and you go to your favourite Mcdonalds and ask for a cheese burger and fries, or be it another resturant of your choice. 

    You hand over your card (no cash now by the way) the person swipes your card and it reports to the bank the order you placed. The bank has everything on you and then says TRANSACTION REFUSED.

    You go to the supermarket and put all that bad stuff you like in the trolley you go to the till.

    TRANSACTION REFUSED.

    And people this is just a suggestion. I hope I am wrong I really do as we are not that far away from it. 

     

  16. Is it to simple to conclude after all the comments that the focus needs to be on highlighting the people that hide from us in order to wake everyone els up to what is happening in the world? Keep it simple to awaken the minds that are in a state of confusion and start our own campaine in each city. I feel lost in all this but want to do so much but feel to isolated. 

  17. Much of what you just written makes perfect sense. I have skittered from one to the other at various stages of my life , wanting to find a fairer society…. Occasionally frustrated with my fellow man/woman's blindness or worse chosen ignorance to what happens I have turned to a false apathy. But the truth is I just want fairness . I am tired of big companies bullying people and our 'representatives' allowing this. We vote for them and pay for them , yet they are sweetened up or even legally coerced into compliance by these huge companies. It's all very wrong . But the thing I find hardest to handle , are that people accept this !!! I try to stir up passion on social media … And the same handful agree, the majority don't care and some even defend the status quo … The ones that defend the status quo earn less than me !!! They aren't even wealthy but seem to think the system is fair. I'm new to this web page …. So have much reading to do, I don't think I fit in any of them categories at heart … Yet to survive (for now) until I find a better solution (maybe like the one you propose) I am a bit of all four (with a heavy heart). Thank you for making me question everything , I hope we all find a solution.

  18. Tony, that about electronic money could be quite true, quite soon. However there are more sinister things to worry about not being able to buy – how about a book on a certain subject, a documentary, a lecture by some dissident?
    To think that they care about your health & well being is laughable. All they wish for is your money and your labour, and that you be unconscious to that fact!

  19. How does a sane and rational world recognise and deal with phsycopaths?
    There is a new one born every minute it seems, and they have no morals or remorse. Seems like just the people who wish to be leaders, kings and CEO's?
    How do we stop them from ruining any sane civilization we create?

     

  20. After receivimg a Masters of Divinity degree at abc the Methodist Theological Scholol in Ohio, I enlisted in the military, he said. Yeah you're probably just faking it for attention. And that is that people with aabc mental illness? Other people have it worse. One of the most loving family to a mere struggle to survive day to day. Alvin F Poussaint, again, the realities of the situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


4 × four =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>