The Police What they can and can't do THE BASIC TRUTH!!
Do you feel intimidated when pulled over? Do you feel intimidated when stopped in the street? Do you feel that you are obliged to give them information or answer their questions? If your answer is yes to any of these questions, then you DON'T know your rights. A police officer is not what he was many moons ago, in bygone days they cared for their employers (yes you) they actually wanted to help you, they wanted to solve crimes, they had compassion, a sense of fair play and in response to this they earned our respect and admiration.
ALL of that has changed! police officers are now revenue agents plain and simple and if officers are silly enough to think that's not true, or just wish to profess it isn't, try not giving out fixed penalties for a month and see if you don't get a talking to! The truth is they are now your adversary and that is not meant in a violent way, more like a game of who can get who to do as their told, and they are trained to get from you what they need to actually fine/arrest you by actually getting you to consent. Lets quickly look at all laws that don't include
Death or Injury to others, Damage to another's property or using fraud in your contracts, ok these three very heavy crimes are all you can truly be guilty of YES its all you can truly be guilty of!!! Anything else is just STATUTE LAW and the simple to remember definition on this law is laws that only apply if you consent to them!! here look: Statute: "Legislative rule of society given the force of law by the consent of the governed". Yes look at the last four words, "CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED" that is you!! so if you don't consent then they cant do, yes I know what your thinking, but it is that simple. Ok officer walks up to you and says "can I ask you some questions" don't consent, ask him "what the nature is of the intended detention?" and record the conversation and let him see your doing this, use your mobile, 99% of the mobiles available today have recorders to go for it! If he says you cannot record this conversation, then what he is in fact saying is, yep you guessed it!! I don't consent to be recorded, so you simple say "Ok am I free to go?"
The simple fact is they NEED your consent, and they have some very cool tools to use to get it, one is intimidation, another is acting, they act like your friend, they act like they care the just ACT! put you off guard and most of you sing like canaries!! they other weapon of choice is Inconvenience you don't have time to waste playing the chess game so you sqwauk to get away quicker, and wham! they have their result! If you are pulled over for an offence under an act ie: speeding, seatbelt or some other infraction it is all part of the "Road Traffic Act of 1988 keyword is "ACT" and believe you me what merry old act it is, this is pure stage play.
They when issuing a ticket need your name SHUT UP! don't argue with them as it is adversarial just SHUT UP! they need your name and date of birth to confirm which corporation they are going to give the bill of exchange to (bills of exchange defences are simple) but were not doing those right now... so no name, no d.o.b no address, don't give anything to work with, don't say a single word no matter what coersion they try, hell they might even go for some "good cop bad cop" stuff this is great to watch when you are fully aware of their lack of power, its like watching "eastenders" if they read you your rights you have to say you understand them for them to be put on you, AGAIN YOUR CONSENT (get it) don't say a word!!
Now these officers of revenue don't like the grim realisation that they have no power, you could get arrested, yes am afraid they can still arrest you, but the worst they can do is keep you for a few hours, so get some sleep, oh and if you have a notarised claim of right, with a schedule of charges for arrest and detention, then sleep even sweeter because these fools are paying you to learn that they have no power! I know getting arrested isn't nice, they know this, that's why its one of their tools to get you to sing like a nightingale.
But if you don't go through it they will always have that power over you. Now if they are going to arrest you, one nice way of them playing into your hands is if you say a these few of words, " Officer I am a peaceful man, there will be no violence, but you are obliged to note that if you are going to arrest me it will be under protest and duress at all times! and I reserve all of my rights at all times, and I waive none of those rights at any time for any cause or reason, If they take you to the station remember DON'T SAY A SINGLE WORD hell you might get a new name! "JOHN DOE" lol If they try to fingerprint you, tell them you do not consent to this, if they try to get your DNA tell them! you do not consent to this, if they touch you, tell them, "Officer I do not consent to be touch at all"
MAKE THE FACT YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS KNOWN, THEY WONT DO IT AGAIN, YOU WILL FIND OUT WHY LATER! but trust me they will only act illegally if you continue to let them do so. To close,... remember any soppy acts they like to quote are powerless, a clawless, toothless tiger.... they have no power if you don't consent.
Warmest Thoughts to you all Guy Euden
ALL of that has changed! police officers are now revenue agents plain and simple and if officers are silly enough to think that's not true, or just wish to profess it isn't, try not giving out fixed penalties for a month and see if you don't get a talking to! The truth is they are now your adversary and that is not meant in a violent way, more like a game of who can get who to do as their told, and they are trained to get from you what they need to actually fine/arrest you by actually getting you to consent. Lets quickly look at all laws that don't include
Death or Injury to others, Damage to another's property or using fraud in your contracts, ok these three very heavy crimes are all you can truly be guilty of YES its all you can truly be guilty of!!! Anything else is just STATUTE LAW and the simple to remember definition on this law is laws that only apply if you consent to them!! here look: Statute: "Legislative rule of society given the force of law by the consent of the governed". Yes look at the last four words, "CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED" that is you!! so if you don't consent then they cant do, yes I know what your thinking, but it is that simple. Ok officer walks up to you and says "can I ask you some questions" don't consent, ask him "what the nature is of the intended detention?" and record the conversation and let him see your doing this, use your mobile, 99% of the mobiles available today have recorders to go for it! If he says you cannot record this conversation, then what he is in fact saying is, yep you guessed it!! I don't consent to be recorded, so you simple say "Ok am I free to go?"
The simple fact is they NEED your consent, and they have some very cool tools to use to get it, one is intimidation, another is acting, they act like your friend, they act like they care the just ACT! put you off guard and most of you sing like canaries!! they other weapon of choice is Inconvenience you don't have time to waste playing the chess game so you sqwauk to get away quicker, and wham! they have their result! If you are pulled over for an offence under an act ie: speeding, seatbelt or some other infraction it is all part of the "Road Traffic Act of 1988 keyword is "ACT" and believe you me what merry old act it is, this is pure stage play.
They when issuing a ticket need your name SHUT UP! don't argue with them as it is adversarial just SHUT UP! they need your name and date of birth to confirm which corporation they are going to give the bill of exchange to (bills of exchange defences are simple) but were not doing those right now... so no name, no d.o.b no address, don't give anything to work with, don't say a single word no matter what coersion they try, hell they might even go for some "good cop bad cop" stuff this is great to watch when you are fully aware of their lack of power, its like watching "eastenders" if they read you your rights you have to say you understand them for them to be put on you, AGAIN YOUR CONSENT (get it) don't say a word!!
Now these officers of revenue don't like the grim realisation that they have no power, you could get arrested, yes am afraid they can still arrest you, but the worst they can do is keep you for a few hours, so get some sleep, oh and if you have a notarised claim of right, with a schedule of charges for arrest and detention, then sleep even sweeter because these fools are paying you to learn that they have no power! I know getting arrested isn't nice, they know this, that's why its one of their tools to get you to sing like a nightingale.
But if you don't go through it they will always have that power over you. Now if they are going to arrest you, one nice way of them playing into your hands is if you say a these few of words, " Officer I am a peaceful man, there will be no violence, but you are obliged to note that if you are going to arrest me it will be under protest and duress at all times! and I reserve all of my rights at all times, and I waive none of those rights at any time for any cause or reason, If they take you to the station remember DON'T SAY A SINGLE WORD hell you might get a new name! "JOHN DOE" lol If they try to fingerprint you, tell them you do not consent to this, if they try to get your DNA tell them! you do not consent to this, if they touch you, tell them, "Officer I do not consent to be touch at all"
MAKE THE FACT YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS KNOWN, THEY WONT DO IT AGAIN, YOU WILL FIND OUT WHY LATER! but trust me they will only act illegally if you continue to let them do so. To close,... remember any soppy acts they like to quote are powerless, a clawless, toothless tiger.... they have no power if you don't consent.
Warmest Thoughts to you all Guy Euden





Hello, just seen something
Hello, just seen something strange, well i think is strange on the street. Basically was walking down the street and a police van stopped infront of me. 2 police officers got out and told the man infront of me very forcefully to get in the van. what struck me as odd was he wasnt cautioned charged read his rights. when he was in the van obviously i couldnt hear what was being said but the man had his hands up as if to say he'd done nothing while the officer was shouting in his face. all this was in maybe less than a minute. i was waiting by bus stop next to this after about half an hour the man who had been stopped was let out the van an shouted in obvious frustration to what had just happend and told to shut it by the officer. could anyone explain to me what happend here?
Hello Guy, A few months ago
Hello Guy,
A few months ago the police came knocking at my daughters boyfriends parents house at 3 oclock in the morning arrest him on suspicion of assault.My daughters boyfriend who knew nothing whatsoever about this alleged incident and protested his innocence but was arrested,handcuffed and carted off to the local station to be interveiwed.At the station he was interveiwed,photographed,fingerprinted and had a sample of his dna taken.He was released without charge in the morning and bailed to return to the station six weeks later.When he was due to go back to the police station he phoned to speak to the officer who was dealing with his bail but he was told the officer was on leave and to phone back the following week which he did only to be told again that the officer wasnt available,he phoned several more to get this matter sorted and when they finally spoke to him it was to tell him that no further action was being taken much to his releif as he doesnt have a criminal and didnt want to get into trouble for an alleged incident that he had no knowledge of.
Yesterday he recieved a phone call from the police saying they had forensic evidence linking to an offence commited four years ago relating to criminal damage.Again he has not got a clue what they are talking about but has agreed to go to the station next week to be interveiwed about this new allegation.Any suggestions would be appreciated on what would be the best course of action to take regarding this matter.
New Source of Info!
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to bring to your attention a new source of info regarding Freeman-on-the-Land & Common Law. I have placed a page on www.thetruthwillout.com especially for it, and I am hoping that this site may well publish a seperate peice on it so it gets to as many as possible? Anyway you can find it here; http://www.thetruthwillout.com/freeman_uk.html
Warmest regards,
Matt.
donation of constantine - unholy unroman unempire
You have included 'fraud in your contracts' as a crime. Effectively the 'police' are seeking agreement by deception, coercion and force rather than by informed consent. A contract can be verbal or written, the contract is sometimes completely one sided, variable and it appears self evident that the police are using fraud in contracts.
It depends to some extent how far back in history one wishes to look as to how many power cons one wishes to look into. If one goes back to the fraudulent 'donation':
"Because the Donation was a fraud and no subsequent priest of any Catholic derived denomination ever had the right to crown kings, Britain has had no legally reigning monarch for 900 years. As a consequence of this, all the laws passed by these monarchs were and are illegal and worthless and all the government agencies set up by or derived from these monarchs or their laws are also illegal and worthless up to the present day.
When considering this, the reader might like to consider the fact that all the arrests ever made by the police in Britain and Europe are acts of kidnap and habeus corpus. Equally, any man who has taken up arms for the crown and killed for his country is unprotected by law and guilty therefore of murder.
Howver, paradoxically, as the entire British legal system is illegal, there are no laws, and so the crimes of habeus corpus and murder as we define them today, simply do not exist. Subconsciously, people know that their politicians and monarchs have no legitimate authority to rule over them."
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=06FkpD0ihzMC&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=dona...
"Because the Donation was a
"Because the Donation was a fraud and no subsequent priest of any Catholic derived denomination ever had the right to crown kings, Britain has had no legally reigning monarch for 900 years. As a consequence of this, all the laws passed by these monarchs were and are illegal and worthless and all the government agencies set up by or derived from these monarchs or their laws are also illegal and worthless up to the present day."
Oh Dear!
It keeps going back further and further!
Dave...
First I thought it was to 1973 due to all laws from then onwards being of a foreign power i.e. europe.
Then I find out that it is supposed to go back to 1911 after the Parliament Act was passed.
Now, if you're saying it goes back 900 years and that all laws passed since then have been illegal, then what really is true English law? Because as far as my brain can calculate surely that would then make the likes of Magna Carta 1215, The Bill of Rights1689, Charter of Liberties 1100, Declaration of Rights 1688/9 and the Treason Act 1351 all illegal as well and there would be no point in any of us being here or trying to declare ourselves freemen of the land as no such thing would exist in this country or be legal??? If what you say is true then wouldn't we have to start over from scratch in our quest?
John
I've had a thought on
I've had a thought on this.....
A lot of common law orginates from France, and was intergrated into our common law with william the conqueror around 1066. So I would think common law being based on natural law is possibly a starting point?
I also recalled Thomas Paine - The Rights of Man when reading this post so inconsideration of this it would seem the French were still more fair than us even in the 1700's.
How things change ; )
starting points
"If what you say is true then wouldn't we have to start over from scratch in our quest?"
These things are choices. I would regard true law as laws that are already here, not laws that man has made up (made up = fiction). There are many interpretations/terms of this, common law, natural law, divine law, unwritten law. In the case of the constitution common law was included, if these laws are common and apply equally to all then we are all equal under these laws.
Becareful now------
The Magna Carta is so fundamental to the beliefs on this site--please think before you post.
If I were you I would remove the 900 years bit.
Going back to 1911 is more than sufficient to demonstrate your point.
-----------------------------
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply can not be bothered to take and interest.
900 year mention
Hi all, well just to put in my bobs worth, many things have come to light during extensive research, hours labouring through dross, spin, lies and deception have slowly been fruitful and magna carta does have good in it, but it is right to know that we know now things far far deeper, that speciality is however Johns domain, and no one explains it better, at some point he will put up the next saga in his assault on history as we have been indoctrinated to believe.Guy Euden
Constantine
Do you think you can go back and get Constantine to repent for his sins Dave, or use that argument to stop someone being arrested, rightly or wrongly?
I would say that if you feel the whole British legal system is illegal, then its time you set about making it legal, as for sure as long as you live in the UK you are subject to it.
And trust me, you can get hauled off kicking and screaming that you not---but hauled off you will be.
We all here know how corrupt the system is harping on about it does not help.
Constructive plans to change it will.
I have no doubt that you will be talking about these issues in ten years time long after Britain has been adsorbed i to the EU
------------------------------
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply can not be bothered to take and interest.
resoudre
Trust you Mr Grothier, one day perhaps but today is not that day. I posted only recently on the issue of a number of police forces being involved in kidnapping public witnesses and theft of evidence, although self evidently complete madness that wasn't the story told in the newspapers. Thus I think it appropriate the public does have access to what has really been going on whether or not it is welcome news. In relation to the Vatican those cons are not only historical but current. The madness is top down, replacing the fake monarch is something I see as a constructive measure, it could give people their lives back. That could be the end of the corporate scams like the vatican, crown, EU and UN, an end to the central banking con, an end to the government con, an end to slavery. An end to slavery in england could free the world, by contrast it now enslaves the world. I see that as positive Mr. Grothier, I see it as simple Mr. Grothier and I know the public will always pick up the pieces..
I posted on the basis that
I posted on the basis that visitors here may not know, I suspect most legal professionals don't know certainly the ones I have asked just practice procedure rather than understand law. That despite the fact the catholic church eventually admitted the fraud. If people realise they have been fooled, surrounded by lies and assaulted by the media daily they might be inclined to think for themselves, that might save them being misled in the future, that strikes me as constructive and the reason I posted..
New Film From Rob Menard (Think Free)
Well done Guy, another fine piece of work!
Just wanted to bring to everyones awareness a new presentation from Rob Menard. The google video link is here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=436798682226252164&hl=en
Warmest regards,
Matt.
Travel
There are some great posts being fired out on here of late, thank you folks what a great team you are, the more knowledge we gain the more free our lives can become, one thing that has struck me though is the issue of passports. I mean You can be free on this Island but without a passport you are a prisoner here because passports are in the JOHN DOE id category
Now im wondering whether there are any Common Law status on travel or right of passage to depart this land and return home.
Travel
Hi yes, you can travel, you dont need a 3rd party license when you have your brain and you BOND!, write to the country that you wsih to travel to and let them know you have posted a bond (once you have that bond that is), that is all your passport does, it is a travel bond for the want of a better word, privatley begotiate your own, we dont need these cretins in power to do that for us.You will find that soon as you "understand more, you will open doors to more understanding" an agreement between you and the hosting country is sufficient.understand they trap you by thinking they make it easy for you, a passport makes it easier to travel, and tbh, if you dont my using one USE IT! just think very heavily about allowing RFID that is a huge no no for me.Soon they will try to use madelines disapearance to their own ends, havent you ever wondered why it held in the media at such high profile for so long? it because the first stage of their assault will be gps so you know where your kids are and they are safe! hell my ex wife even bought it!! I said no way would I put my signature to paper to consent to that, and explained to her what this was all about, and she is now not so quick to think its a good idea.Anyway, there is no reason not to use your passport while you have it, mine ends 2013, that will be my last, as I wont give fingerprints or DNA or retinal scans which will soon be required, if you want to renew yours do it real soon!Guy Euden
how do you post a bond is it
how do you post a bond is it you contacting them and saying you created a bond or is there anotheer way you create it.
Boat?
"...You can be free on this Island but without a passport you are a prisoner here because passports ..."
Take my boat. [I dont like flying].
asked and answered
You have answered the question as the only attempt at legitimacy for authority is the claim of protecting rights, to hold you prisoner would be the opposite.
They have done this nonsense globally for so long people don't even know they are slaves and can even fear freedom. Freedom starts in mind and it helps to let go of all the structured thinking that has been layered in during life. Requiring registration for leaving is a commercial con, it has been running for humans longer than it has been running for other livestock like cattle though they refer to joe public as the human herd.
IND is the con to restrict travel as they try to increase pressure against an increasingly informed populous who would regardless on mass oppose the planned changes..
Boat
As a master of yachts up to 200 tons, I agree take your boat ;)Guy
Flying
Tried flying got tired of flapping my arms and getting nowhere, I suppose I could row around the world its just as tiring on the arms but atleast you get there in the end...Hopefully!
I wonder if the chalet I booked will still be available by the time I reach Australia?