Recourse is ours in any eventuality regarding the real truth.
With the simple understanding of the 1911 Parliament Act and the two crucial elements changed within this Act namely;
-
The presumption that the royal assent would always be presumed to be automatic- no Sovereign would be allowed an opinion nor could they act as the Constitutional safe guard with this presumption.
-
The removal of the Lords powers of Veto against all taxation bills with subsequent effect of the full destruction of the Lords powers.
You quite simply come to the understanding, without the need of men’s lies to the simple recognition of the truth, that is;
-
Her majesty has never actually signed any Act or Treaty nor has any Sovereign from 1911 onwards, the last to sign being George V; The Parliament Act of 1911.
-
That the power of the Lords to Veto any bill has been destroyed including the actually destruction of the true Lords being from hereditary peers to life peers.
-
That the true power in this country resides with us the people, we have Sovereignty, and we only lend the power to be governed properly, so to destroy our Sovereignty, you first must destroy the very element we invested that power in.
-
Parliament has claimed Sovereignty illegally after removing the elements that stood in its way, by way of the 1911 Act; the Lords and the Sovereign.
-
To use the lies of men to destroy the need for our Sovereign by getting the people to believe in those lies so they do the job for them; exactly what our government have achieved by way of the internet and the main stream media and with a relentless series of gatekeepers to shroud the truth.
Her Majesty, I feel, is in Constitutional prison with two elements of fear being used against her; two elements are as thus;
-
The fear of abolishment from a Sovereign Nation to a Republic which is educed by the governments control over the people and the relentless propaganda to force the peoples will into destroying their own Sovereignty, by simply removing the Constitutional safe guard; remember we have Sovereignty, even though people are deluded, they could do this, without even realizing what they are doing, with the pressure applied by the traitors.
-
And that she now truly feels her people have deserted her.
Our Sovereign, true Law; no Sovereign, true Law cannot exist.
We need our Queen and our Queen needs us; for without this, our Sovereignty, our Nation and our Law cannot survive, for these are the most crucial elements needed to be in place, for our Constitutional Law to work, for without this it cannot work, as is most evident in any court of law, and subsequent legislation being imposed on us as a people.
I know from that fateful time in 1911 that all Sovereigns of this nation have not only believed they have lost the ability to protect their people, they have lost the respect of the people, not through their own doing, but through the lies of men and the peoples inability to see through those lies for what they really are. We have allowed ourselves to be so conditioned by these lies, that we as a people are destroying the very element that can save us in a stroke of a pen and have allowed for the destruction of two crucial elements that would have protected us from the dictatorship that now resides not only in the Commons of this country but also in the Lords.
The truth is we are to blame for the destruction of this country and all that is happening now and all that will happen. Why? Because as a people we have failed ourselves and allowed this to go on for so long and have allowed for two very crucial elements of our Constitution to be destroyed. We have allowed ourselves to be fooled by the lies of men and men's knowledge, portraying a reality we all seemingly believe, based upon our own inability to see the faults in ourselves and rather to continually see the faults in others and then blame them faults in others for something that has only resulted because our own failings.
In reality true law must have a attribute that is based upon the only real true divine rule of law; no one, without any exception is above the law. Law must be built upon morality, an absolute, our Constitutional Law stands for that attribute, although not worded, but in clear concise morality, when understanding the Wisdom of those who penned it. Any law built upon the attributes of control and fear lacks that one crucial attribute, which amounts to only one understanding; it is not law at all, but just a system of control in the guise of law.
Our Constitutional Law holds recourse for any eventuality that will be forced upon us as a people . It allows for the people to use their sovereignty to enter into Lawful Rebellion to assist our Sovereign and help them use our strength as a people, to bring about the change so few seek and so many are completely unaware of, to return back to the true rule of law and a true governance based upon our freedoms, or quite simply it allows for us to remove our Sovereign, to be replaced by a new English Sovereign of the peoples choosing, who will govern this country and the people of this country based upon the morality of our true Constitutional law and the freedoms asserted by our Law.
The 1911 Parliament Act was Parliaments first grasp at true control of this country, the Sovereign and its people and it will be their undoing, when the people quite simply understand what it actually achieved for these traitors and successive traitors, and what has resulted from the biggest , most blatant act of treason committed against this country, its people and its Sovereign.
On a personal note:
In sending my Affidavits to Her Majesty I used our Constitutional Law and used Constitutional documents (Affidavits invoking article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 the founding document of our Constitution) to deliver a clear and concise message to my Sovereign and to the traitors in Parliament. The message to my Sovereign; I am here to help, the message to the traitors; the games up.
Her Majesty, the traitors in Parliament and myself fully understand what recourse the people of this country have at their disposal, through the use of Constitutional Law, in any occurring eventuality regarding the truth that will be known. Simply this is what the traitors fear, they fear you actually realizing the truth, that you have true law at your disposal, as you are the ones who have Sovereignty and once the British people realize that by using their own Constitutional Law in their defense, they can rid themselves of political diversion, subversion and suppression of the true law of this land and those who have illegally and treacherously done this, along with their legislation, rules and control, and actualy stop their obsessive desire to destroy this country.
legal - or lawful?
For anyone yet to fully grasp the difference:
At the heart of this is the crucial distinction between 'the Law' and man-made legislation.
The basis of 'the Law' is self-evident, applying to all people at all times and in its simplest form consists of the following:
1) Do no harm to others
2) Deprive no one of their rightful property
3) Use no mischief in your contracts.
'Legislation' on the other hand is simply that which legislators create in order to accrue power to themselves.
That which is made by man can - and will - be undone by man.
Conversely, the Law is eternal and empirical. It was not created by men and therefore cannot be undone even by the most mendacious of legislators. The Law does not require the consent of the individual. Its basis is eternal truth.
Legislation is entirely different. It has no power without the consent of the governed. In essence, it is a cheap magicians trick exposed by anyone not bewitched by the illusionist's gestures.
Our consent is achieved through coercion and the exploitation of our general ignorance of the above.
The restoration of true sovereignty will bring about the restoration of the supremacy of the Common Law, whose basis is the three fundamental elements listed above.
Although I remain unsure as to Her Majesty's level of culpability, it is certainly true that a genuine, uncompromised constitutional monarchy is the most excellent of bulwarks against globalist treason and the selling out of our birthrights as soveriegn citizens. For this reason alone I thoroughly commend your approach, John.
As a footnote, the date of 1911 is not remotely arbitrary. It was at this time (according to the Reece Commission Report for the US Congress) that the tax-exempt foundations in America were laying plans to radically alter the face of American life through the continued undermining of her sovereignty via war and economic upheaval.
Anyone familiar with Professor Carroll Quigley's 'the Anglo-American Establishment' will already be aware just how much the elites of both countries work in tandem for the same goal, via such unelected bodies as the CFR and RIIA (different branches of the same tree).
The stronger a light we can shine, the faster the roaches will scurry.
Chilling statement
when we now know that Fabians are the majority in Westminster, majority i say, after reading at the societies own site, that 300 are sat there at our expense.
What a very chilling statement this is;
In his book former French intelligence officer, Pierre de Villemarest, writes that The EU, the Bilderberg and Monnet´s ACUSE have a common origin rooted in Fabian Socialism: "It is standard practice in Fabian Socialism not really to fall out with anyone, to make it known to the opponent that one is only wanting to be on good terms with him, so that negotiation takes precedence over confrontation. ‘One’ does not want to know that across the table there exists possibly a dictatorship, the Soviet Gulag or the Chinese Gulag. The most important thing is to come to an agreement. Even if this is on the back of whole populations."
Taken from a site i frequently visit due to our media censorship! http;//euro-med.dk/?...
Keeping me informed regarding the EUMED, which our own politicians seem all too reluctant to mention, after decades of it being formed, the time approaching for it's implementation, yet it still is mostly a guarded secret from our all too trusting population.
http://video.google.co.uk/vid
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-6884017322536911169 Should we not be helping Albert Burgess?
The more of us demand police action at our local stations, then they surely must do their duty otherwise they themselves are neglecting to do their duty and should face arrest!
Arrest the police...Who will?
And who do you think will arrest the police?
Get real your peeing in the wind.
The only way you will arrest the police is to have the power to do so---and I dont see anyone getting that short of taking it from those who have it!
-------------------------------------------------
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply can not be bothered to take and interest.
Our own BRAND NEW Political Party
Getting the message across to the rank and file.
I don’t think that there is one sensible person here that would find fault with the idea of creating a whole bright shining brand new political party.
New concepts for a new and challenging world and something to blow the socks off any semblance to the tired old existing systems.
Sure you will say there are many new parties out there and many old ones–correct, but to me they all make the same mistake…they fight for whatever change they want from within. I don’t want to make this an indepth academic posting, I want to keep it as simple as my message is.
We need change, we must have change and change is inevitable! Change wont be easy, no matter what the namby-pambies here think. Change will not be brought about through the establishment submitting to the higher echelons of mystical ancient wisdom. They know all about that and many in fact have some of the same idiotic reliance in whatever they perceive to be ancient, mystique, and selective.
As John Harris discovered the hard way, no matter what the constitution says about your rights–-“you ain’t gonna get ’em” if it means taking power away from those who already have it.
I have always stated openly, and honesty, that if you want a return to the system that supports your constitutional rights under the concept of us all being freemen in common law and heritage–-then brother you are going to have to fight for it!
You are not going to have this delivered on a plate because of a few petitions and affidavits delivered to an evil corrupt monarch who has already treasonously solid this nation out.
OK that said, I have no love for this monarchy, this government, or this system of administration–that’s easy to say!
But get this as the is more difficult–-–I have no love in general for a crass indolent, gutter brained British public either, who disgrace this nation even when abroad. We are in fact a nation of drunken louts, male and female crass louts.) of course there are exception and decent people, but they are a decreasing minority.
To an extent loutish British cant help being so, its the way we have all been indoctrinated with cheap government tactics–-we have sold our souls its true, and in doing so lost out dignity and pride.–(show me a first class example of a good man in Parliament today!)
No point harping on and most here will know what I mean.
OK some ideas for a New Party and brand new fresh political party.
Firstly, I would move the New Parliament out of London–who wants to go there anyway, you cant move, its congested and polluted and way to expensive especially for the ordinary folk–-Leave London for the tourists!
I don’t think that the monarchy would have any place in my idea of a brand new concept for government! L ook at the evil effects of too many hangers on that we endure today–-however that would be an issue for the people to decide as ultimately all major decisions must be made through enlightened referendum. Not, I stress, the manufacture versions we suffer today–-that is when we get even those shallow version of them.
The most innovated of all proposition would be free access to the law.
It ridiculous in a society that lives under the rule of law, to find so many people disenfranchised from the law as they simply cannot afford to litigated. Therefore there would be no lawyers fees, no court fees, no costs– All lawyers would be paid by the state and the law would be freely accessed as it should be.
Therefore there could be no abuses of the law as there would be complete accountability.
Accountability would be in place at all tiers of the administration and violation of one’s sacred oath to serve the public with integrity and dignity would be a capital offence.
The NEW PARTY would of course be anti Europe
That will do for now there is of course much more and I would welcome comments. I would propose Brian Garrish for the leader and John Hughes as Deputy Leader of the NEW PARTY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply can not be bothered to take and interest.
We need the Monarchy
The problem as reported at the very top of this article is that the Monarch has had their powers taken away from them since 1911. How about repealing that Act and restoring powers to the Monarch especially regarding threats to our sovereignty and democracy. I agree that the Queen at the moment is held in bondage by the government and is alarmed by the pace of change and fearful.
I am strongly against becomming a republic as that is precisely what the present mob want and what the EU wants. It is also strongly supported by the BBC in their biased propaganda and dishonest reporting.
Traditionally, with the exception of the United States, Constitutional Monarchies have always performed better economicaly than Republics.
I believe in restoring the Queens powers as the final check and balance. She should be able to fully reject anything put in front of her if it is not in the best interests of the British people, is against the laws of this country, and she should not be in fear of the government. Nothing should be able to side-step the process and be forced through without royal ascent.
I am currently researching heavily into following the same course of action as John Harris and think this website is great. I'm a UK Independence Party member and have been for two years since I left the Conservatives after only 10 months of listening to David Cameron talk nonsense about the environment and about giving hoodies a hug.
I think we have too many political parties as it is, we don't need another minority party. How about everyone supporting the UK Independence Party, help make them a major force for change and good, and suggesting your ideas to them for ditching the EU, restoring the rule of law in this country and kicking out the traitors currently in office?
Cheers,
John
John, I'm an ex member of
John, I'm an ex member of UKIP because I twigged they're just like the Tories. I was enthusiastic at first, running around delivering leaflets in what little spare time I had and after joining the local committee I stood in a by-election. It was good experience but, I realised I may as well be pissing up Niagara Falls. The hierarchy starts right there, right at the local level. The local chairman was an ex government flunky pulling a pension and would shit himself everytime I suggested doing something a bit daring.
UKIP are not going to stop the European Union. UKIP is a safety valve mechanism to catch all the anti-EU people in one net so they get nowhere. Farage may be a better frontman than Knapman but, they're not going to change anything. It's all hot air.
Declan Ganley, the frontman for Libertas (Libertas campaigned in Ireland for a 'no' vote in the referendum to ratify The Lisbon Treaty) is planning on fielding candidates in the EU elections all over Europe on the single issue of 'No' to the Lisbon Treaty because all countries in the EU, apart from Ireland, have been denied a referendum. People will probably be better off voting for his candidates than UKIP.
DARREN.
This is a lesson many like you Darren are learning the hard way. All these new parties spring up everywhere simply don’t have a chance. NOT even the supposedly fastest growing UK political Party the BNP.
You see the problem is that all shout and scream for change, but they all insist that they can bring change through using the current system–THEY CANT!
CHANGE HAS TO COME FROM THE OUTSIDE IN---- AND NOT THE INSIDE OUT!
So we lumber on in the same old way with the two party politics system pulling all the strings ensuring that either New Labour or the Conservatives GET A TURN ON THE SWING.
However those with the really power remain firmly in place forever in the shadows and pulling their puppets’ in parliament strings.
What we need I suggest is a BRAND NEW PARTY and a Brand New CENTRE FOR GOVERNMENT–––-in other words a total clean sweep.
London is now a tired old city, its political demise has been reassure with Boris, I would have thought that after Livingston the electorate would have wised up–-but clearly its going to take a revolution for that.
Moving out of London is not such an outlandish idea, the might, glory, and grandeur of Rome suffered a dented dignity when the Ancient Empire’s capital was moved to Ravenna–-so all thing are possible.
Britain, I believe simply cannot continue to function as an united identity the way that we are going we must get rid of the dead weight on top or be dragged further down by it. 650+ useless MPs is enough for any nation to stomach, let alone the diarrhoea of our Euro MEPs
Old styled politics in Britain is now dead, its just not lying down, until that is, we the people stamp on its head.
------------------------------------------------
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply can not be bothered to take and interest.
Another brand new party,
Another brand new party, David, I'm not so sure. It seems to me that all the possibilities in that direction have been exhausted. It's a hard lesson I've learned at great personal expense. I also believe that we have been looking outside ourselves to others to take responsibility for the big decisions for far too long. Look where that's got us. We're in heaps of trouble.
My solution would be in the declared sovereignty of the individual with a pact between all peoples under God's law, the Common Law; we are free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty, property, or rights of another.
I'm sick of other people trying to tell me and my family what's best for us, at our expense and for their benefit. A new party, despite all the best intentions, would eventually default to a self-serving political entity.
It has to be a complete paradigm shift away from the existing one based on freedom and co-operation not fear and coercion.
The responsibility of decision making must be with the individual. There is no freedom without responsibility. As personal responsibility is relinquished, freedom dissolves into slavery, no matter what clever face is painted over it. Giving away our personal responsibility for decision-making to political parties is what has landed us neck deep in the shit. Every time we put an X in a box at election time we are giving up our personal responsibility to make decisions and leaving it up to others. Most of the time people haven't even met or spoken to the person they are voting for. They simply consent to being governed.
The change has to come from inside us by taking responsibility for our own thoughts and actions and, most importantly, our deeds.
This site is the closest thing I can see to actually bring about the change required for a world based on freedom and co-operation because it embraces the Common Law, the only law - our birthright.
It's why John Harris is being attacked here by anonymous people who are trying to undermine and ridicule what he is doing. They call him a 'muppet' when it is they who are the 'muppets' or, more appropriately, puppets because they serve the existing system that seeks to enslave us.
DARREN.
I think your solution is on the road to being the right solution, as you say–––-My solution would be in the declared sovereignty of the individual with a pact between all peoples under God's law, the Common Law; we are free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty, property, or rights of another.
A pact or contract between people would in fact be a sound foundation for a BRAND NEW PARTY made up of like minded dedicated people, who take an oath of loyalty to each other and to serve the best interest of the nation.
This is something that would need a great deal of debate to get right but I am sure that we could eventually arrive at a Brand New Party establish in trust and honour for the benefit of all and not like anything else seen to date. This would not default as the system we adhere to simply would not allow for that, as the change would have been our change and as you say one that has to come from inside us by taking responsibility for our own thoughts and actions and, most importantly, our deeds. It would then be your complete paradigm shift away from the existing one based on freedom and co-operation not fear and coercion with the later words not in our dictionary. However please don’t make the mistake that we as a race cannot live without our beloved Common Law as you say again our word would be a world based on freedom and co-operation because it embraces the Common Law, the only law. Therefore you must never lose sight that just as surely as we need our common law there will always be those ready to break such laws and in order to ensure equity of justice there will be our judges and those judged.
Even the most primitive tribes that survive today exist with a social hierarchy and respect for the tribal elders normally the law makers and judges. I have no problem with that as I have long felt that one of our basic problems that we suffer from today is a LACK OF RESPECT for all things dear and scared..
I don’t go much for silly name calling, especially for those who don’t have the balls to put their name to it! They are none persons, but to substantiate my point you will always have those idiots and therefore our new society will always have the disciple to regulate their unwarranted behaviour–-however we still have a ways to go––but with careful consideration and honest debate we will get there.
__________________________________________
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply can not be bothered to take and interest.
This is a very good post
This is a very good post David and in my opinion those that have been upset by your comments should read this very carefully to realise where you are coming from.
I have thought along similar lines as this for a long time. To me it seems very logical. If only people could see that that by changing the way they think and do something new, then it IS possible to change things for the betterment of ALL in Britain-- as you said, a paradigm shift.
___________________________________________________________________________
Our New Constitution--The Beginning
All well and good -- but,
I seem to recall that the labour party helped ukip get 12 mep's (and we don't need mep's - we have ambassadors) - who in turn had to swear an oath to the eu - (treason) - and it turned out they have their snouts just as deep in the trough as the others! They were supposed to fight the eu from within - and how can one lot of traitors kick out another lot??
Current established parties are a waste of space.
Queen, Country, Constitution and future!
With respect to all views held. I really think you need to fully understand the “ACTUAL” powers of the queen and exactly who swears their personal oath to her, over and above any oaths sworn to the nation and its citizens. Dig deep enough and you will see that the British queen is absolutely omnipotent and you will find also that this concept of a constitutional monarchy is just another load of old codswallop misinformation set about at a time when it was unfashionable and extremely undesirable to have powerful unelected kings and queens.
Our queen is a shrewd old bird–you would all be wise to realise this.
Ass for Britain becoming a republic at the behest of Europe, if we all had the strength of character we would have kicked expansionist Europe into touch ages ago and re–established Britain at the head, in fact, of a mighty Commonwealth which would ensure a subservient Europe.
On the balance of probabilities, I would fall for keeping the queen, but on our terms ,as there is substance in tradition.
Even Adolf Hitler had the intelligence to see that Britain’s rightful place was at the head of her former Empire and recognised and accepted Britain contribution to the world’s communities……why the hell can’t we, who are British, see this?
------------------------------------------------
There are those who will not be satisfied until there is nothing left, and the fault is with us the people!
Its we the people who have allowed ourselfves to be so badly served while we simply cannot be bothered to take and interest.