Interesting telephone conversation between Brian Gerrish and Buckingham Palace.
Following the sending of my Constitutional Lawful Affidavits to Her Majesty the Queen regarding the miss-governance of our country and subsequent third party reply I received from senior correspondent Mrs. Sonia Bonici, Brian Gerrish a dear friend of mine decided to telephone Buckingham Palace to ask Mrs. Bonici a few questions relating to these matters.
What you are about to listen to is the conversation between Brian Gerrish and Mrs. Bonici, which to say the least, is quite revealing concerning my Affidavits, how they have been dealt with by Buckingham Palace and the subject of how this country is being sold out by Parliament to the EU.
One of the most astounding comments I found amazing was the fact Mrs. Bonici quite forcefully states that Her Majesty is nothing more than a ‘Constitutional Monarch who cannot intervene in the matters concerning the EU and it is down to her ministers’. I am sure you will all agree that it is very apt that Her Majesty intervenes in the matter of this country being sold out to the EU and that is what a Constitutional monarch should be doing.
Many more comments like the one above are made by Mrs. Bonici and I am sure you will find this very interesting to listen too.
To all concerned I, John James Harris take full responsibility for the publishing of this video and it has been published to enlighten the British Public concerning the activities of all concerned with the deliberate sell out of this country to the EU and subsequent miss handling of documents sent to Her Majesty regarding the very serious issue of the miss governance of this country.
Transcript of the call made by Brian Gerrish to Buckingham Palace.
BG = Mr. Brian Gerrish
SB = Mrs. Sonia Bonici
"This is Buckingham Palace, this call is being recorded and may be used for training
purposes. If you have been asked to call this number urgently, it's because of a hoax
message and you should hang up immediately. If however you have a valid reason
to call the Royal household please hold for an operator."
Ringing....
Answered, ÒPrivate secretaries office can I help you."
BG - Good afternoon, is that Mrs Bonici?
SB - Speaking.
BG - Yes hello, my name's Brian Gerrish, I'm calling to ask if I may a couple of
questions about a letter that's been posted on a website with respect to an affidavit
which has been submitted to the Queen.
SB - Right.
BG - Are you aware of that affidavit?
SB - No, not at all, I've no idea, I mean I just deal with correspondence that comes
in and I reply if I'm instructed to do so, erm, your name is Brian...?
BG - Gerrish
SB - G.A.R.I.S.H?
BG - G.E double R
SB - Could you spell again please?
BG - G.E...
SB - G.E...
BG - Double R
SB - Double R
BG - I. S. H
SB - I. S. H I'm so sorry.
BG - Okay, well I got a letter in front of me dated May 2008 in which you actually
reply to the affidavit which a Mr. John Harris sent in, and you say that you forwarded
his correspondence to the Foreign and Commonwealth office because it relates to
the European Union.
SB - Right.
BG - But the only thing is his correspondence didn't relate to the European Union.
SB - Right, can you give me his name again sorry I'll look him up.
BG - Okay, it's John Harris, H. A. double R. I. S.
SB - John Harris.... there's lots of John Harrises, - pause.
BG - But Mr. Harris submitted two signed affidavits to the Queen which went
recorded, in fact, he tried to hand them in personally but they were sent recorded
delivery in the end, and you've obviously received them because you replied to his
letters. Would it help if I read your letter it's very short?
SB - Yes please.
BG - I am to thank you for your recent letter addressed to the Queen on the subject
of the European Union. Careful note has been taken of your comments, however, as
her Majesty receives many such letters it is not possible to send an individual reply
to every one. Policies on... (Interrupted) Pardon...
SB. - I see, this was a form letter we sent, it isn't dear Mr. Harris or anything on the
front is it, on the top it's just a third-party reply.
BG - Yes, but it's your signature.
SB - Yes yes, I, I, yes, right.
BG - What is of interest is that Mr. Avidav.... Mr. Harris sent an affidavit which didn't
mention the European Union.
SB - How very strange, I don't always see these letters, because I sign, when when,
the problem is, I'll start from the beginning. The problem is we have about 2000
letters in a back log, and we have, I have a team of ladies who help me, a very small
team, but they help me reply to people, if it's about the European Union or if it is
about a certain thing, and we know that the European Union letters would go to the
foreign office for example and they read the letter and once it comes back, and, erm,
what may have happened if it's nothing to do with the European Union it might be
that it got mixed up with the European Union stuff and sent on by mistake. That's
the only thing I can think of.
BG -But how, how, excuse me, how would a signed letter from yourself, with your
signature at the bottom, how...
SB - A batch of letters, because it's a third-party reply and I give it to my ladies to,
erm, to send off on my behalf, so if it's for the European Union they will have a letter
see, because the Government, does it actually say foreign office on there?
BG - Your letter says that it's been forwarded through to the foreign office.
SB - Ah, because...
BG - This gentleman has sent to affidavits, signed affidavits, and the only reply he's
got is a letter from yourself, which you are now telling me you didn't really send, it
was...
SB - Éthat I've seen, I mean that I have seen, that's the only problem. Can you tell
me the date that I replied, is there a date on there or has he just got May?
BG - It just says May.
SB - May.
BG - But this, this is incredible, with due respect, this is absolutely amazing, that
somebody...
SB - Right, quite right...
BG - ... has sent an affidavit, and effectively you're telling me that it hasn't been
received or processed.
SB - It has been received and it was sent, prob, it was erm, rec... probably received
in this office, opened, sent to the Queen, returned to us with, with instructions but
somehow it's got mixed up. That's what I'm trying to say, because I I didn't see this
letter, so I think...
BG - But, but...
SB - it's got mixed up...
BG - Mrs. Bonici, with great respect, I cannot believe that you're prepared to send
out letters with your signature on referring to other letters which you haven't seen.
SB - Because we, I only put my signature to it so that somebody has a point of
reference so you can come back to me, that's the point, otherwise a third-party reply
has always gone out without any signature at all, and I'd rather somebody came...
BG - So how can you possibly say in the first paragraph of your letter, careful note
has been taken...
SB - Well would have done, because it would have gone to the Queen. And careful
note not by us, careful note, but the Queen would have taken careful note.
BG -Well if...
SB - I am a bit concerned now because I'm just trying to think where the letter would
have gone to, so if the foreign office perhaps, erm, would you mind sending me a
copy of what you have, and do you have a copy of the, of his letter, Mr Harris's letter,
what, err, can you answer something else actually, why are you speaking on behalf
of Mr. Harris?
BG - Well it's very easy, because the letters to which I refer are clearly available to
the general public because they're on a website.
SB -Oh right, okay. So you're not in concert with Mr. Harris.
BG -Well, I am but I've, I'm making a total independent phone call because I, I, I read
through the material on the web site and I was so fascinated I decided to ask for
myself.
SB - Right.
BG -But the man has submitted an affidavit to the Queen on an incredibly serious
matter, which is the miss-governance of this country.
SB - So it shouldn't have gone to the foreign office in the first place.
BG - Absolutely. But he's also submitted a letter to you, back to you on 13 May, so
you must have personal correspondence from Mr. Harris there.
SB - I haven't at the moment, I haven't seen, err, anything from Mr. Harris, at the
moment, but that doesn't mean that...
BG - But it went by recorded delivery.
SB -Yes. It would either be, erm, with the Queen still, but hasn't come back to us
because that can take a couple of weeks, but I shall look for it, if he's written then I
shall have a look. Can I have more details...
BG - Can I do something which will probably make your life easier; have you got
access to the web to there?
SB - I have.
BG -If you were to logon to the following website it's very simple, it's, www.
SB - yes...
BG -T.P.U.C.
SB - T for Tommy P, P for Peter, U C
BG - that's correct, dot ORG
SB - Right
BG - And you can see an exact copy of the two affidavits that Mr Harris has sent,
and you will also at the top of a page see you're letters referred to and you can click
on it and it will show you a copy of the letter.
SB - Right.
BG - So I'm afraid to say you are in the public domain, which is why I...
SB - That doesn't surprise me.
BG - That's why, why I feel entitled to respond.
SB - Fine, yes, now you did right, thank you very much for that. What I want to do
now is take a copy of this and, erm, pause... (whispers) and what I'll do is I'm going
to look for Mr. Harris's letter if he says he is written on the 13th then I will find out.
BG - Can I ask, I'll call it a point of protocol.
SB - Sure.
BG - If you, if the Queen receives letters about the European Union, do they just get
forwarded to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office?
SB - While not at all, it depends what is said, but if it is a foreign and Commonwealth
matter, rather, the Queen can't intervene if she's a, she's a constitutional sovereign,
she won't intervene in in in these matters and she leaves things to her ministers,
which is why the ministers concerned at the moment for the European Union is the
Foreign & Commonwealth Office.
BG - Are you aware that members of the public have been reporting treason to
police stations?
SB - I'm, I've, I have heard that err people say this in in letters, absolutely yes.
BG- Well I, it's happened in fact because I, I am one of them. I have actually taken
documents to a local police station, to report treason, as committed by the Heath
government and perpetrated by successive governments.
SB - Sure, sure.
BG - And these are very serious issues...
SB - Sure.
BG - ...and I find it extraordinary that somebody has sent these affidavits into
Buckingham Palace.
SB - I don't understand why that didn't come to me directly actually, I'm quite
perplexed now, the computer is very slow and trying to print, ah, here we go. I'm
going to print out his letter and I want to find out where his 13th of, you say he's
written on 13 May, I will find that letter and make sure it's on my desk and I shall
reply to Mr. Harris myself but, high don't understand why it got mixed up and sent off
if it had nothing to do with the European Union...
BG - Well many of us would say that it is quite extraordinary but a lot of documents
concerning peoples views on the European Union tend to get lost.
SB - Err, not not from us though I must admit it's not, that that wouldn't have erm, it
wouldn't get lost from our point of view, we do send them on because we have to, we
are instructed to send them on to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office.
BG - Yes, but one of the conundrums is that the Queen cannot be sovereign and a
citizen of the European Union can she?
SB - I can't comment on anything like that I'm afraid.
BG - Well...
SB - UNCLEAR
BG - I'm sure you can but common sense would say that that applies to the situation
in which we find ourselves, so something is not quite right and Mr. Harris I know is
now admired by a huge number of people from his courage in actually making a
statement that there's something absolutely wrong in the country.
SB - (Whisper)... He has a perfect right to say...
BG - Hmmm.
SB - UNCLEAR - I'm sure.
BG - He has a perfect right to believe that having written and communication and a
very important one to his sovereign that he gets a proper reply.
SB - Yes I can understand that to, I'm just really sorry that he didn't, I don't
understand why that happened, really I don't understand why that happened.
BG - Right.
SB -But erm, I will try and, I will try and find his letter of the 13th and I will reply.
BG - Okay.
SB - It's very very odd, I'm terribly sorry about this and please apologise to Mr Harris
for me, I have no idea at this particular moment I'm still trying to print but it's not
working it really isn't working, I'll have to erm...
BG - Right Okay, erm, if letters are forwarded from Buckingham Palace to the
Foreign and Commonwealth office who who would actually deal with them on behalf
of the Queen?
SB - We would send it on to the private secretary at the Foreign and Commonwealth
office, that is probably your best but actually to talk to them, however, I mean erm,
you're, he's still talking - my lawful in turn to the traitors in Parliament - so in a sense
he is talking about the European Union.
BG - Why, do you think the European Union is traitorous?
SB - No it's because you've been saying that about treason and everything else, I
presume that that's what he meant.
BG - Ah well, this is a subtlety isn't it because the...
SB - Just quickly scanning this...
BG - What what we have at the moment erm, ministers are themselves signing
documents handing away power many would consider...
SB - That's exactly right, that's probably why my team actually sent it on and itÕs
probable the right place for it to go.
BG - Well I believe there is a large amount of debate to be had over that because
whether it's the place of your team to deal with a matter which is addressing treason.
SB -If it's a matter of European Union then my team are quite correct in sending it on
to the foreign office because there's nothing else...
BG - But but with great respect erm Mr. Harris does not mention the European
Union.
SB - I'm sure, I can't see it mentioned here.
BG - Absolutely.
SB - So what would he mean and unless unless we, unless erm, sorry I was just
trying to read it as quickly as I can. Well I'm not going to go into debate here
because I haven't seen the original letter so I'm going to erm find his letter of the
13th and then erm, reply to him directly.
BG - Okay.
SB - All right?
BG - Well, I'm very sure he'll be interested in your response, thank you very much...
SB -Okay, thank you for calling.
BG - ...for talking to me, okay, bye bye.
Conversation between BG and the Palace
Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
Well done BG for exposing this huge deception.
Why don't we all phone Mrs. Bonici
I'd like to say that I think John Harris, Brian Gerrish and all the others involved in highlighting this issue are all HEROES!!!!!!! And need all the support they can get.
I will phone this Mrs. Bonici and ask her why she hasn't replied to John Harris, as she promised. I will also ask her for the name and address of the person to whom John's Affidafitt was sent in the FCO, and I'll write to them and ask what they have done with this important document.
This is such an important issue and it is great that it is being BROUGHT INTO THE LIGHT. Let the light shine on the slithery slimey traitors and their corruption.
Also, if anyone has any other ideas on how we can do our bit to support this movement, please let us hear about them. I'm sure that everyone reading this will want to do their bit.
Thanks again.
disenfranchising the public
A very sound thought and deed. It is public participation they have sought to exclude hence they are dumbing down the media to point people away from looking at what is being done in their names knowing all too well it would not be accepted. It is insufficient to step aside, the voice of the people must be spoken by the people until it is heard over the mockingbird media.
Betrayed by the Queen
It is a sad reality that we must all come to terms with that Her Majesty has conspired with traitors to betray the British people by allowing our national sovereignty to be transferred to the EU - without our permission.
I have a letter from Buckingham Palace, signed by the Queen's senior correspondence officer (Mrs Sonia Bonica) of Brian Gerrish's tape fame, that says quite categorically, and I quote " ....there is no question of Her Majesty, as a consitutional Sovereign, refusing Royal Assent to an Act which has been passed by both Houses of Parliament."
So there you have it... the Queen accepts the Sovereignty of Parliament over the sovereignty of the people who she swore an oath to. So the people's freedoms and liberties have been sacrificed by our Queen for the benefit of a few hundred traitors.
I was under the impression that Members of Parliament swore allegiance to Her Majesty and not the other way around and I am also quite certain that the Queen swore an oath to govern us according to our laws and not those made on foreign shores.
Our position is perfectly clear... we must withdraw our consent to be governed and lock up the perpetrators of this crime.
Her Majesty's part in this affair
I have long thought along the same lines as Roger. I'm sorry John (and Brian), but it's very, very unlikely that the Queen is not in cahoots with current and past governments to give away sovereignty.
I think the fight is far larger than originally thought, because now it's not just the non-governance of our country by quangos and dodgy ministers, but the destruction of GB with the knowledge and support of our Royalty. The rot is complete. If the Queen will not abide by Magna Carta, then it's up to the population. But that throws up so many other difficulties, because the "recently arrived" don't know what Magna Carta is, they have no allegiance except to themselves and will most certainly not fight to preserve the laws enshrined 700 yrs ago, and the rest of our are being (deliberately) cowed. Reporting treason at police stations can continue, but the Police are not educated in these matters. Treason was taken out of our law books many years ago.
One of the first ways in which to start destroying a nation is via Education, ideally over three generations. Turn out kids who are dim and cannot think independently. Their children will experience the same decrepit education system, and the next generation too, until there is no one in a family with any wherewithal, who is capable of independent and logical thought - and there you have it! a gormless, cowed, unthinking society.
Not Gormless but uneducated
Cindy although I agree with the thrust of your argument I think it's a bit unfair to call our indigenous people gormless when they were educated and brainwashed by the powers that be in successive curriculum changes that ensured our people do not learn about such things, I know because I was one such person, and I am not gormless, just brainwashed to not think correctly. Calling people gormless is not going to make you any friends and will not get them on your side.
The problem being how to bring it to their attention in such a way as they understand why our liberties are being taken and how they can fight it. It is an uphill struggle against thirty or so years of brainwashing and will take time which we have not got. In reality we only have the Internet, and although it's a good medium it's not the best to get at all our people and educate them, if you are a web designer you know how hard it is to get your site noticed so that it attracts thousands of hits a day, and this is what is needed.
We need mass advertising on Television and of course we are never going to get that are we! so we just keep plugging away and try to get into the news, which is controlled by the very people we are trying to get rid of, so that is going to be very hard to do.
Just do it
A mass citizens arrest needs organising against parlaiment
Forget marches or protests. Citizens arrests by the multitude would be the best solution, that way any police who attempt to stop us can be arrested as collaborators also!
Come on folks im up for it are you?
COPY THIS LETTER PLEASE
I'd be grateful for a copy of your letter please - I haven't received any replies from Buck House yet - and it won't be long before i am due in court - I could use all the defence i can get.
Best Regards, John. (H - not harris).
Please explain why you are going to court?
Hi there, what are in court for my email is guy.euden@yahoo.co.uk im a freeman too
Surely the best thing is to
Surely the best thing is to re-send the documents (recorded delivery of course) for the personal attention of Ms Bonici - now that we know she is in charge of the correspondence.
That may be a more productive way forward than wasting time trying to track down the originals.
...
It might be useful to put the contact details up that others can chase up whatever Mrs Bonici has lost. The establishment fakes consent on the basis they exist, that imaginery consent is cancelled when people ignore the propaganda press and voice their objection.
Mrs. Bonici doesn't need the original to act she has a copy of the letter on her computer. If she was in any doubts as to whether the copy was authentic or not she could phone John Harris and ask but I suggest there is no doubt.
re: human relations at buckingham palace
Although I suggest it is self evident that this is the product of good conscience I think it is in the same vain to say so and present thanks of what has been done by the few for the many.
The Power of ER MAJ
Have you no idea of the powers of ER MAJ? It is she who supports the EU if she did not, it would not be an issue.It is she who holds power but not executive power; thus all military,banking,legislation,foreign policy is by her design and consent and cannot be otherwise. By craftily evading executive power, she also evades accountability for the actions of her appointed officers on her behalf. She is above the law as are her agents.
ER MAJ presides over The City of London which abides by laws not of the land, although all banking and legislation issues forth from the principality of The City of London. She is a powerful member of The Black Nobility, and presides over the Committee of 300. Information on this bloodline is well researched and documented for those who take the trouble to ask the really important, fundamental questions. Like who is this women and where does she come from?
She presides over her own personal militia and mercenary groups as well as all military affairs. She has the power to disolve parliament,to decree Martial Law (coming soon) to make laws and remove them. Nothing happens without her knowledge and approval.Nothing.
She is deeply committed to the New World Order and is therefore a staunch advocate of The EU. Her relative, David Cameron is her approved next PM. Prince William will be most likely crowned either 2012 on his 30th or 2015 as Willliam V on his 33rd birthday which marks the 300th anniversary of James Stuart's conquest by William of Orange; thus uniting the two bloodlines on the throne of power. William bears all the hallmarks of the one spoken of in Their Crown publication The KJV Bible as the Anti-Christ. So woe betide us! He has already been caught on photograph displaying the classic Satanic salute and his brother has been caught in Nazi regalia just like Grandpapa. Just a laddish joke, of course.
You really don't know what kind of world we really live in, do you? You accuse people of treason for criticising the most evil criminals in our midst who will unleash terrible harm because we are ignorant. Calling people traitors because they have had the painful awakening into truth is only supporting those who will surely enslave and kill you and your greatgrandchildren if they permit any to be born.
Please also consider that the whole idea of 'nationalism' was to amass people into sacrificing their lives, lands and freedom for Royal wars of conquest for something called 'their country' - a bit of flag.Since when have the people of this land owned the land or made the laws? For the truth about warfare, see John Perkins Confessions of an Economic Hitman. It has nothing to do with sovereignty and everything to do with power and money to a rapacious, gluttonous degree knowing no bounds.
Someone on this site called for a 'public enquiry' well the joke is that such enquiries are known as Royal Commissions and that is why all public enquiries like Diana's murder, are a complete farce.Like appointing the wolves to investigate the slaughter of the sheep. Must'v been the sheep dog, Guv. Funny enough, Wills was pictured holding a lamb like the 'good shepherd' he has been groomed to be.
To understand ER MAJ you would need to understand Egyptian Dynastic Rule under the brutality and 'majesty' of the Pharaohs. ER MAJ is Illuminati/Elite and thus an Arch Criminal of the zenith degree. May you learn the truth, John - perhaps in your pursuit of justice, you will.
To thine own self be true and surely you cannot be deceived by any other.
Your Comment
Daft Aida, you're not so daft are you? What you have written here makes a whole lot of sense....to me, at least. I have been thinking along similar lines, I did not want to, as I have no problem with the Queen at all. The "hangers-on", now they are a different matter entirely.
If, what you say is true, and I see no good reason for it not to be, then, John is wasting his time over trying to get ERMAJ onside.
This also, needs some thinking about. Regards, Sandie.
From the little I have seen
From the little I have seen of distant and recent history within the high and often secret corridors of power the structure is military in form and function. Life is considered of no value rather it is the power and the script that is ruthlessly defended. A slip of the tongue has been enough for heads to roll with just another suicide, accident or illness being given to the media to parrot out. For mankind to be free those in unique positions of responsibility need to be free also not locked in a chain of command that requires them to act blindly, against conscience and in fear. That is madness, the treason should be properly challenged and clearly this is being done.
History tells a story that mankind has blamed leaders who have failed rather than helped them up, that mankind has favoured those who have said what people have wanted to hear rather than standing together and fast behind truth and those who have been true to their conscience. Times are a changing, Brian Gerrish was clearly not for misdirection and an answer was promised and remains due.
Dear DaftAida Whatever
Dear DaftAida
Whatever the truth may hold in store for us, I know, our true Law holds the course of action needed in any eventuality that is presented to us.
The truth is simple, mankind makes it complicated
Dear DaftAida, You are
Dear DaftAida,
You are absolutely right.
Dear John Harris,
I told you this a year ago.
You say "our law holds the course of action needed in any eventuality".
The vast majority of these laws determine a "subject's position, in relation to the monarch".
(And what's more they tend to rely on "25 barons")
The Queen is BEHIND all of this, John. She is the monarch who has sold us all down the river. To expect ER MAJ to sort it out is about as futile as using a teapot made out of chocolate.
Only *massive* non-cooperation will have any effect.
We have to get rid of this treacherous Queen (and all her heirs), as well as this treacherous government.
And only "We, the people ..." can do that.
With the greatest respect I
With the greatest respect I have answered in an article, which is only my humble opinion, but is an opinion, that cannot be changed by the repeating of men's lies.
http;//tpuc.org/node/282
The truth is simple, mankind makes it complicated
Incredible video!
Hi John, Brian and colleagues,
Amazing video that deserves a full and thorough investigation. Have added it to www.thetruthwillout.com and we fully support your great work towards setting the people of Britain free from the treasonous people! Your passion, wisdom and courage are uplifting John, I have confidence & faith in your journey. There are many that keep bringing up the issue of the Queen being neck deep in the root of this mess, and I would just like to take this opportunity to say this;
With respect fellow living souls and as a mere polite suggestion, please attempt to read between the lines, gain and use wisdom and be mindful of your thoughts, especially those sparked by righteousness and/or fear. I have respect for others views, yet it may be worth checking to see if they are truly (deeply) yours, and not just repeated from somewhere, or someone else!
Love and light.
Matt.
"quite perplexed now"
An incredible conversation, the mention of affidavit seemed to put Mrs. Bonici into immediate high stress, two affidavits generating a silent pause and a background whisper as the actual affidavit was accessed online. Listening repeatedly to the phone conversation manifests with increasingly clarity how bizarre and seemingly nervous the various attempts were to explain why the crown has not responded appropriately to affidavits on issues of such gravity.
By Internet hierarchy royalty is now a subdomain of government “royal.gov.uk” (domain hierarchy is always backward ending with the root domain). No attempts for an explanation resolved the specific points of law and principle that were raised by Brian Gerrish and in the affidavits. It sounded as if there were several attempts to find composure, explain what had happened but shouldn’t have, hadn’t happened but should have with even one attempt to assume authority and suggest it was not within Mr. Gerrish's remit to call as a third party. It was though accepted that the call was independent on an issue of public interest which was already in the public domain and letters concerning treason were familiar to Mrs. Bonici. It was suggested by Mrs. Bonici that the letter had gone to the Queen, been returned to her department, that she had signed an inappropriate response to a letter she asserted she had not previously had sight of (and using a different format to other replies bearing her signature which directly referenced referral to the Queen). The letter itself being misdirected to Mr. Miliband's department which as the FCO is potentially implicated by allegations of treason though she suggested Mr. Gerrish might like to contact them.
The communications were computerised and instantly accessible but not during the convesation on account of their being too many people with the name John Harris, the originating letters visible online real time though attempts to print out the letter weren't working: "I am still trying to print but it is not working, it really isn't working, I will have to um ..").
Although Buckingham palace is exempt from the FOIA citing they are not a public body within the meaning of the act, their terms of exception seem to warrant responses to requests relating to how many letters concerning treason her department had handled and how many had been lost and found:
"... exemptions will need to be assessed against a public interest test, i.e. whether or not the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing it."
http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page3622.asp#2
What Mrs. Bonici has had sight of is now established and the department that doesn’t lose letters has now had sight of a letter that was apparently previously missing and unseen by the respondant.