I'd be grateful for anyones thoughts and opinions on any involvement the cancer charities such as Cancer Research UK may or may not have with the drugs companies.
Some people may remember disclosures on television years ago of porton down using cancer inducing agents secretly against NHS patients, sometimes on an ethnic basis. The television disclosures I saw were when kitchens had crown immunity and radioactive food was being given to patients without their knowledge.
On more recent bioweapons experiments in the NHS the public is very likely to know about the flesh eating diseases and these produce alarming statistics if you look at the kill / cure ratio of the NHS. Again, easily avoidable and curable problems though by natural event they would not be happening at all. However extreme this post may seem, these things are covered up but official statistics are stark and reveal the purpose for which the NHS was created.
It is perhaps an aside but one of the things I found most disturbing in relation to intelligence agencies was one in relation to their MAD (medically assisted death) operations. Inducing fast acting cancer is unfortunately something of a long term habit for british intelligence. Protected by the official secrets act, experimentation is on whole populations and due to military break throughs I expect the government to want everyone's DNA.
A large car factory in London was built on a hot nuclear test site, one has to look through a completely different mindset to analyse what has been happening, public lives are only of such value as to what they can provide.
I have investigated charities in other areas and found them to be part of an elaborate myriad of front companies forming a closed network. These were charities people were likely to pay for out of sympathy but to donate to them is to cause harm. Having seen how the crown corporation through its security agencies creates a complete monopoly, I do not have doubts that this would apply to medical charities. Worst of all with charities, in the name of good will, the public is in effect paying for the protection racket. Important to add that as with all fields in life, completely genuine people do chartity work, but of course very genuine people work for charities, good will is easy subverted through control of information and authority.
From what I have seen, public medicine is just a friendly face to research, the research being turned backwards to determine how to control, exploit and cause harm. Human beings are bioelectric, one option with cancer is apparently to use twice the rf frequency of the cells of interest and that is the end of them. If that information is correct then it is one of several cancer cures I have seen.
I have seen military research papers that the public would not have access to in related rf research, this is relevant looked at from the stand point of causing harm to human beings and when they say mobile phones is new technology and the dangers are unknown these are complete lies. Research goes back decades ago and unfortunately scientific experiments in this field extend to remote mind control.
From the false news that is presented in the media over the years on medicine and what is not being done, this would makes it rather obvious what the cancer charities are part of. With carcinogens being placed in drinking water, fuel and the air, one would think one would hear from a cancer charity if there was a real one. I had a tumour myself of a the kind that kills quickly, a sample of it was sent to two military research facilities, porton down bioweapons research in the case of the UK.
Well, I've just cancelled my small monthly donation that I've been making to Cancer Research UK for over 20 years. I never suspected anything until watching the video about hemp resin being a cure for cancer. Your post, Dave, has made me feel more certain I've made the correct decision.
You can get Vitamin B17 from Apricot Kernels and when you get the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4901132.stm telling you not to eat more than 2 in a day, they most be good for you!!!
Prevention is better than cure, a topic that is easy to analyse raw data on and research is vaccinations, a topic Tony Blair was questioned on but refused to give a public answer to.
Control of people is through ignorance, false information often worse and a monopoly of supply. If independent developers make discoveries, these are dealt with and the crown corporation has a system whereby patents are secured and unnavailable to the public. Such issues are what the terms like Defence of the Realm and the Official Secrets Act means,
A conflict of interest arises between public and state because so many curative treatments are natural, it involves a transfer of power to people if they are able to support and heal themselves. When investigating drug dealing by the crown, both at home and abroad, I came across incredible stories much like these.
To give one example, an American I spoke to had a job that was destroyed following damage to his shoulder and he was advised that the only option was radical surgery. He looked at people who had had the surgery and it would have incapacitated him for life. lost him not only his job but damaged him seriously for life. A chance encounter meant a doctor gave him some friendly advice in private. Like some of the videos here, cure was complete.
What happens instead of natural remedy, medical processes are reversed to find ways to control and harm people.as applies for example when it was found how to make synthetic ergotamine. Early exprements in the UK by MI6 and Tavistock included trials on some 80,000 troops and publicly disclosed (now reclassified) documents from the crown's CIA record an order for LSD accounting for the equivalent of 100 million doses.
I include an example where I can include first hand knowledge, AIDS and the cure. When AIDS was engineered and deployed by vaccination programs in the third world, it became something of a panic when infection reached back into the western world.
Although I suspect there is only one pharmaceutical company now, what was then the welcome foundation in England was offering the Aids cure. This was interferon, it was known before it even went on the funded trials in the NHS that this added to the burden carried by people who already had mortal problems. Poisoning people who are already dying is something that would be repugnant to most people, but people are bombarded every year with the same stories of medical break through in the offing, the fake marketing technique of 'free beer tomorrow'.
Britain has a vista between image and reality like no other I have seen on earth with the possible exception of Switzerland, of relevance to this topic as it is where drugs and the drug money flows. Tony Blair is now employed directly by JP Morgan who funded LSD. In the case of AIDS and the cure, the disease was synthesised and the cure a fake.
Cure doesn't serve the interests of a business, this is protected by the state and their laws. The Talmud has been the basis of UK law since 1066 which places a fictional entity over and above human beings.
From my own research and discussions with people I conclude the NHS was set up along with other organisations for eugenics. According to insiders the elites take a cancer prevention, a mixutre of herbs mixted with sugar and cures for cancer include resonant rf targeting.
If I remember correctly Kew gardens was where the poppy was perfected for the opium wars, MI6 being the largest drug operation on the planet, nations are taken over through drugs as happened to China, America and courtesy of imperial forces being present in Afghanistan, even by official accounts, heroine production is at an all time high.
Cancer Research
I'd be grateful for anyones thoughts and opinions on any involvement the cancer charities such as Cancer Research UK may or may not have with the drugs companies.
cancer research
Some people may remember disclosures on television years ago of porton down using cancer inducing agents secretly against NHS patients, sometimes on an ethnic basis. The television disclosures I saw were when kitchens had crown immunity and radioactive food was being given to patients without their knowledge.
On more recent bioweapons experiments in the NHS the public is very likely to know about the flesh eating diseases and these produce alarming statistics if you look at the kill / cure ratio of the NHS. Again, easily avoidable and curable problems though by natural event they would not be happening at all. However extreme this post may seem, these things are covered up but official statistics are stark and reveal the purpose for which the NHS was created.
It is perhaps an aside but one of the things I found most disturbing in relation to intelligence agencies was one in relation to their MAD (medically assisted death) operations. Inducing fast acting cancer is unfortunately something of a long term habit for british intelligence. Protected by the official secrets act, experimentation is on whole populations and due to military break throughs I expect the government to want everyone's DNA.
A large car factory in London was built on a hot nuclear test site, one has to look through a completely different mindset to analyse what has been happening, public lives are only of such value as to what they can provide.
re: charities
I have investigated charities in other areas and found them to be part of an elaborate myriad of front companies forming a closed network. These were charities people were likely to pay for out of sympathy but to donate to them is to cause harm. Having seen how the crown corporation through its security agencies creates a complete monopoly, I do not have doubts that this would apply to medical charities. Worst of all with charities, in the name of good will, the public is in effect paying for the protection racket. Important to add that as with all fields in life, completely genuine people do chartity work, but of course very genuine people work for charities, good will is easy subverted through control of information and authority.
From what I have seen, public medicine is just a friendly face to research, the research being turned backwards to determine how to control, exploit and cause harm. Human beings are bioelectric, one option with cancer is apparently to use twice the rf frequency of the cells of interest and that is the end of them. If that information is correct then it is one of several cancer cures I have seen.
I have seen military research papers that the public would not have access to in related rf research, this is relevant looked at from the stand point of causing harm to human beings and when they say mobile phones is new technology and the dangers are unknown these are complete lies. Research goes back decades ago and unfortunately scientific experiments in this field extend to remote mind control.
From the false news that is presented in the media over the years on medicine and what is not being done, this would makes it rather obvious what the cancer charities are part of. With carcinogens being placed in drinking water, fuel and the air, one would think one would hear from a cancer charity if there was a real one. I had a tumour myself of a the kind that kills quickly, a sample of it was sent to two military research facilities, porton down bioweapons research in the case of the UK.
charities
Well, I've just cancelled my small monthly donation that I've been making to Cancer Research UK for over 20 years. I never suspected anything until watching the video about hemp resin being a cure for cancer. Your post, Dave, has made me feel more certain I've made the correct decision.
Vitamin B17
Also look into Vitamin B17 for another cure for Cancer have a look at http://www.worldwithoutcancer.org.uk. This is thier video: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eO0I2jWthko
You can get Vitamin B17 from Apricot Kernels and when you get the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4901132.stm telling you not to eat more than 2 in a day, they most be good for you!!!
Grow your own!
Of course, a freeman can legally grow his own plants and reduce them to oil.
Lorenzo
Prevention is better than cure, a topic that is easy to analyse raw data on and research is vaccinations, a topic Tony Blair was questioned on but refused to give a public answer to.
synthetics
Control of people is through ignorance, false information often worse and a monopoly of supply. If independent developers make discoveries, these are dealt with and the crown corporation has a system whereby patents are secured and unnavailable to the public. Such issues are what the terms like Defence of the Realm and the Official Secrets Act means,
A conflict of interest arises between public and state because so many curative treatments are natural, it involves a transfer of power to people if they are able to support and heal themselves. When investigating drug dealing by the crown, both at home and abroad, I came across incredible stories much like these.
To give one example, an American I spoke to had a job that was destroyed following damage to his shoulder and he was advised that the only option was radical surgery. He looked at people who had had the surgery and it would have incapacitated him for life. lost him not only his job but damaged him seriously for life. A chance encounter meant a doctor gave him some friendly advice in private. Like some of the videos here, cure was complete.
What happens instead of natural remedy, medical processes are reversed to find ways to control and harm people.as applies for example when it was found how to make synthetic ergotamine. Early exprements in the UK by MI6 and Tavistock included trials on some 80,000 troops and publicly disclosed (now reclassified) documents from the crown's CIA record an order for LSD accounting for the equivalent of 100 million doses.
Hemp
It looks like the last three videos have been removed. Anyone know of anywhere else they can be viewed?
EDIT: Cancel that request they're back, must have been a glitch.
AIDS and the cure
I include an example where I can include first hand knowledge, AIDS and the cure. When AIDS was engineered and deployed by vaccination programs in the third world, it became something of a panic when infection reached back into the western world.
Although I suspect there is only one pharmaceutical company now, what was then the welcome foundation in England was offering the Aids cure. This was interferon, it was known before it even went on the funded trials in the NHS that this added to the burden carried by people who already had mortal problems. Poisoning people who are already dying is something that would be repugnant to most people, but people are bombarded every year with the same stories of medical break through in the offing, the fake marketing technique of 'free beer tomorrow'.
Britain has a vista between image and reality like no other I have seen on earth with the possible exception of Switzerland, of relevance to this topic as it is where drugs and the drug money flows. Tony Blair is now employed directly by JP Morgan who funded LSD. In the case of AIDS and the cure, the disease was synthesised and the cure a fake.
cure
Cure doesn't serve the interests of a business, this is protected by the state and their laws. The Talmud has been the basis of UK law since 1066 which places a fictional entity over and above human beings.
From my own research and discussions with people I conclude the NHS was set up along with other organisations for eugenics. According to insiders the elites take a cancer prevention, a mixutre of herbs mixted with sugar and cures for cancer include resonant rf targeting.
If I remember correctly Kew gardens was where the poppy was perfected for the opium wars, MI6 being the largest drug operation on the planet, nations are taken over through drugs as happened to China, America and courtesy of imperial forces being present in Afghanistan, even by official accounts, heroine production is at an all time high.