Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Things they didn't teach you at school, then, and most certainly not now.
Forum rules
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby Ex.Deus » Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:57 pm

You're correct Vie does mean life

And considering none of you are dead surely thats not it.

The Act quotes three individuals by name, Trustee, Husband, Guardian.

Which one is the odd one out?
Ex.Deus
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby jobo » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:28 pm

husband is the odd one out

are you going somewhere with this, or just asking rhetorical questions
jobo
 

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby Ex.Deus » Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:48 pm

Husband and Guardian look after people

Trustees look after property.

No I'm not being rhetorical just pointing out that the statute covers those(I believe the wording is) believed dead or absenting themselves.
Ex.Deus
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby jobo » Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:41 pm

husband is the only one which is gender specific

there no implied requirement that a husband looks after any one or thing, its just a legal status, its also the only on which is part of a partnership as you can be both a trustee and a guardian on your own

oh and trustees look after the interests of the beneficiaries, not the property

so guardians and trustees both look after the interests of people

so husband is the odd one out ??????????????????????
jobo
 

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby Ex.Deus » Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:42 pm

Husband is the only one gender specific, however, if everyone is still alive then there is no need for either a Husband or a Guardian.

Which leaves, property(or as you call it, interests, although to be more precise it would typically be legal title) which therefore brings us to

Trustee.

Although, if it isnt property and instead dead people that might explain why few "freeman" are "heard" in public court, cos they're dead :lol:
Ex.Deus
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby jobo » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:21 am

[quote="Ex.Deus"] if everyone is still alive then there is no need for either a Husband or a Guardian.

live people dont need a husband or guardian ???????????????????????????????????????//

dead people def dont need a husband
jobo
 

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby Ex.Deus » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:25 pm

Apologies my mistake.

It should have read.
if everyone is still DEAD there is no need for either a Husband or a Guardian

I.e A husband is only such whlist his Wife is alive.
i.e A Guardian, would look after a minor, but the minor would have again have to be alive for a Guardian to exist.

I'm still left with Trustee being the odd one out?
Ex.Deus
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:23 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby Digger-Steve » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:07 am

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/ ... 1/contents

have a read for yourself from the horses mouth so to speak
Digger-Steve
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:54 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby greatdeception33 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:21 pm

Fictions cannot be alive or dead, surely a husband is a fiction, a type of legal personality in a contract with the wife with recourse to benefits.The words bypass the living blood ,they are a type of vessel. As is Guardian.

Bride and groom, are descriptions of the living blood man and woman joining together as witnessed by God.
greatdeception33
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Postby outerlimits » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:03 am

greatdeception33 wrote:Fictions cannot be alive or dead, surely a husband is a fiction, a type of legal personality in a contract with the wife with recourse to benefits.The words bypass the living blood ,they are a type of vessel. As is Guardian.

Bride and groom, are descriptions of the living blood man and woman joining together as witnessed by God.




Well in that case we call God to the stand, and ask him for a copy of, or the original of his signature . HAHA thats going to happen NOT!
outerlimits
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:29 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Return to The History of this Island

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest