Bolton Council admit spending Council Tax money on Common Pu

[deadbeatdad]

A further update on this case, we served Bolton Council with a proof of claim and gave them seven days to respond and if they failed to provide the proof of claim in the seven days then they are admitting they had no lawful jurisdiction to remove money for Council tax, admitting they are a company and not an authority and agreeing to pay me £5000 for taking money from me unlawfully. Needless to say they did not respond so I served them with an invoice for £5000 and a little reminder a CCJ will be registered against them.

[ziggy]

good luck mate.

[stygian]

Here are some ideas:

It is unlawful to spend taxpayers money that is not of benefit to the taxpayer.
Therefore:
Please demonstrate the financial and professional advantages of the expenditure of taxpayers money on 'training' courses for council officers, civil servants, provided by Common Purpose. Please identify who authorised the payments.

Shortly, the council's accounts will be open for scrutiny, ahead of audit.
Therefore:
Please direct me to where I can see for myself where in the annual accounts it can be seen the costs of Common Purpose training to the ratepayer.

There are strict rules of governance for any council.
Therefore:
Please show at what council meetings the expenditure on Common Purpose was debated and approved, along with the minutes of any scrutiny meeting.

Where 'graduates' are involved in Common Purpose activities, such as meetings or work on behalf of Common Purpose, there is a consequent cost to the taxpayer.
Therefore:
Please evaluate and disclose the cost to the taxpayer for time and resources expended by Common Purpose graduates who attend Common Purpose meetings, and include the cost to the taxpayer of the associated costs of administration and hospitality.

The Chatham House rules of Common Purpose, plus the fact that meetings are not open to the public, plus the fact that membership is by internal invitation only, formally class Common Purpose as a secret organisation as defined by the national code of conduct for civil servants.
Therefore:
Please identify all graduates of Common Purpose within the council, and provide their declarations of interest whenever they have attended meetings that discussed issues for which Common Purpose Advisory Meetings have already made a decision.

Here are some questions that were put to the corruption capital of Europe - Sheffield, last November:
Questions for Full Council, 5 November 2008+. Of course, the third party is Common Purpose, but is not named in the council chamber because of protocols.

Lord Mayor, this council, in advance of a full written reply, is invited to respond verbally to each of the following with a single word of not more than two letters:

Is it right that:-
1 – decisions concerning policy and expenditure affecting this council are made at meetings of a third party that bypasses the democratic, executive and scrutiny functions of this council
2 – membership of this third party, which includes senior council officers, are chosen by the third party for their value to the third party and trained at ratepayers’ expense, whilst this council has admitted that these costs “ are of no tangible financial benefit to the ratepayer ”
3 – the so-called members, or officials of the third party use unaccounted council employee time and resources for the business of the third party, and as with their so-called training, the activities of the third party within the council have escaped the attention of this Full Council, Cabinet, and Scrutiny Panel
4 – meetings of the third party are held using a corporate account, off-books, to pay for the hospitality at these meetings ( anyone remember “ The Syndicate? ” )
5 – citizens are not only lied to when questions are asked about the third party, but are not even allowed to know which council officers have received the so-called training at the ratepayers’ expense, and legitimate requests are still being unlawfully withheld
6 – the third party coaches its members on how to avoid answering FoI requests and to break the DPA with unlawful disclosures
7 – the third party encourages its members to identify 12-15 year olds for grooming before placement for so-called training without any evidence of having carried out the statutory criminal safety checks
8 – those identified with the third party, in any capacity or association, are among the same people determined as either corrupt or behind the worst and continuing abuses of citizens ?

Lord Mayor and Elected Members, given the date, enjoy the fireworks, but don’t get burnt. Thank you.

These questions caused such an uproar that the effects, secrecy and deceptions continue to this day.

[deadbeatdad]

I posted this to them
Statutory Declaration
maurice: of the barnett family
vs
Corporate Company Bolton Council


This is a to declare that maurice: of the barnett family has never been served with a council tax bill that complied with the Bill Of Exchange Act 1882 and therefore the company trading as a run for profit organisation known as Bolton Council had no lawful riught to demand money from maurice: of the barnett family. maurice: of the barnett family therefore demands proof of claim from the company known as Bolton Council that all demands complied with the Bill of Exchange Act 1882

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that the run for profit company known as Bolton Council, influenced security staff at the run for profit company known as Bolton Magistrates in order to divert maurice: of the barnett family over to the run for profit company known as Bolton Council in order to pervert the course of justice and to prevent maurice: of the barnett family having his case heard under the Local Government Finance Act. Maurice: of the barnett family therefore seeks proof of claim that maurice: of the barnett family was allowed to have the case heard using the local government finance act.

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that he is a human living flesh and blood human and is not a person, maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that the blacks law dictionary does state the following
“Persons are divided by law into natural and artificial. Natural persons are such as the God of nature formed us; artificial are such as are created and devised by human laws, for the purposes of society and government, which are called "corporations" or " bodies politic"

BODY POLITIC
A term applied to a corporation, which is usually designated as a "body corporate and politc" The term is particularly appropriate to a public corporation invested with powers and duties of government. It is often used, in a rather loose way, to designate the state or nation or sovereign power, or the government of a country or municipality, without distinctly connoting any express and individual corporate character.”
therefore maurice: of the barnett family therefore seeks proof of claim from the run for profit organisation known as Bolton Council that the person MAURICE BARNETT they addressed their demand to, is actually a living flesh and blood human.

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that no consent had been given to the run for profit company known as Bolton Council to enforce their Statute Law upon the human known as maurice: of the barnett family. maurice: of the barnett family demands proof of claim that the company known as Bolton Council has a signed consent form from maurice: of the barnett family In order for them to enforce the statute law known as Local Government Finance Act.

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that the run for profit company known as Bolton Council operates under statute law and therefore maurice: of the barnett demands proof of claim that the run for profit company trading as Bolton Council can override Common Law by forcing statute law without consent of the governed.

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that proof has been supplied to the company trading as Bolton Council to show that they are trading as a company, on behalf of the company known as the Government (Labour party) who are also a run for profit who also try to enforce their staute laws through the run for profit organisation known as the House Of Lords. This proof highlights the facts that these companies are unlawfully forcing living flesh and blood humans to pay these companies money against their will using another run for profit organisation known as the Ministry of Justice who then allow the use of their company known as the Magistrates Court. maurice: of the barnett family demands proof of claim that Bolton Councils Statute law has superseded true Common law and that these companies have LAWFUL jurisdiction to force maurice: of the barnett family to pay money against his will without consent.

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that the company trading as Bolton Council has customer service departments, therefore making it legally a company and a company has to run to make a profit. maurice: of the barnett family seks proof of claim that the company trading as Bolton Council is not a corporation and does not run to make a profit.

maurice: of the barnett family does solemnly declare that the Magna Carta 1297 section 29 states the following
“
Imprisonment, &c. contrary to Law. Administration of Justice.
NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor [X5 condemn him,] but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.”

maurice: of the barnett family seeks proof of claim from the run for profit company known as Bolton Council that they have authorisation to override the Magna Carta 1297 section 29 which is still in force to this day and has not been repealed by any statute law.

Please note that failure to show proof of claim to all the above points within 48 hours of receipt of this Statutory Declaration by recorded delivery using Royal Mail to maurice: of the barnett family at the above address, then the run for profit company trading as Bolton Council are accepting what is stated is true and that they have acted against Common Law and that they will pay maurice: of the barnett family £5000 for the deceipt that was used against maurice: of the barnett family and also using the deceipt with the aid of the run for profit company trading as Bolton Magistrates. The run for profit company trading as Bolton Council will also refund ALL monies that have been illegally taken from maurice: of the barnett family since 1993 for unenforceable council tax when living at 145 Ainsworth Lane Bolton Lancashire and also 68 Sapling Road Morris Green Bolton BL3 3QL.


AND I MAKE this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by the virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835

Declared by the human known as first name: of the Surname family

Signed______________________________________Date__________________


Before me Solicitor

-------------------------------------------------------- Date _____________________


They ignored this letter which means they have accepted my contract so then I served this upon them

To Lynda James
You have agreed with the terms and conditions set out in the Statutory Declaration issued upon you by maurice:of the barnett family to pay the sum of £5000 for the unlawful removal of monies taken from maurice: of the barnett family wages. A Statutory Declaration was served upon you as well as a signed second affidavit, and you agreed to those terms and conditions set out in the Statutory declaration. maurice:of the barnett family provided proof that Bolton Metropolitan Corporation are trading as a company and not an authority and you were asked to provide proof that were an authority, within a set time and you failed to do so, that failure meant that you accepted that you are a run for profit organisation and that you held no authority over maurice:of the barnett family in order to demand money for council tax.

You are therefore required to pay the sum of £5000 to maurice: of the barnett family within fourteen days of receipt of this demand. Failure to do so will result in a Liability Order being granted against you and may involve Bailiff action to recover the sum owed.

I trust that you will treat this with the utmost urgency and look forward to payment.


Yours

maurice:of the barnett family
followed by a proper invoice here

Invoice to the run for profit company
Trading as
Bolton Metropolitan Council
To pay maurice: of the barnett family


1. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that they are not an authority and are simply a run for profit company.
2. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that their council tax billing invoices did not comply with the Bill Of Exchange Act 1881, therefore they were illegally taking money for services they were not rendering.
3. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that they were using the money illegally paid to them in the form of Council Tax to pay money to a charitable organisation known as Common Purpose. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that they had not informed the residents nor maurice:of the barnett family that money from council tax would be paid towards an unlawful company known as Common Purpose.
4. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that the council were exceeding their authority by allowing council officials to lead beyond authority which is above what they are supposed to do.
5. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that the statute law known as The Local Government Finance Act had to have maurice:of the barnett family consent in order to demand money towards council tax.
6. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that they did not have the consent from maurice:of the barnett family to demand money for council tax therefore Bolton Council have admitted they have committed treason.
7. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that the person known as MAURICE BARNETT is not the living flesh and blood human being and is INFACT a peice of paer known as the Birth certificate given by the Corporation known as the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION
8. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that they had influenced security staff in order to pervert the course of justice and prevent maurice:of the barnett family having a court case dealt with according to the law of the land.
9. Bolton Metropolitan Council had agreed with maurice: of the barnett family that they had no authority to breach or override the Magna Carta 1297 Section 29 and by doing so the Bolton Metropolitan Council have committed a criminal offence





Amount now owed to maurice: of the barnett family from the run for profit company trading as Bolton Metropolitan Council is £5000.
Please send a cheque made payable to maurice barnett to the supplied address.
Please note that failure to pay the agreed amount will result in court action and a CCJ being registered against you

[Truthseeker_34]

Excellent post

No need to say anymore.

Peace

Truthseeker_34

[Malcolm Ramsay]

I posted this to .... Bolton Council

This is a to declare that maurice: of the barnett family has never been served with a council tax bill that complied with the Bill Of Exchange Act 1882 and therefore the company trading as a run for profit organisation known as Bolton Council had no lawful riught to demand money from maurice: of the barnett family. maurice: of the barnett family therefore demands proof of claim from the company known as Bolton Council that all demands complied with the Bill of Exchange Act 1882

Hi deadbeatdad

There's a couple of things here that I keep seeing on Freeman sites, but don't know what they're based on - maybe you can tell me?

What's the relevance of the Bill of Exchange Act? A bill of exchange is similar to a cheque, something that people use to transfer money to somebody else - but a council tax bill is a notice of liability/demand for payment. I don't see why that Act would have anything to do with it.

Also, why are saying that all these organisations are 'run for profit'? The only explanation I've seen so far is John Harris pointing to the phrase 'Trading as' on the Dun & Bradstreet reports, but this doesn't seem much to go on - they'd say the same thing about a charity shop.

I hope you don't mind me asking ... I suspect your answers may prompt more questions.

[Mike D]

Hello everyone

I have a few on going matters wuth SOUTH RIBBLE BOROUGH COUNCIL in Lancashire that I thought I should shsare.

It is true that the 'Bill' issued buy the council says bill on it but it is defined in the local government act as a demand made by a billing authority. It states in this act that liability has already been assumed therefore they are know demanding you pay! Its all fun and games.

This is why it doesn't have to conform to the bill of exchange act because it isn't a bill, it's a demand, they want you to think its a bill, but it aint!

I am sure to most who read this forum it may seem easy to write these things but not so easy to practice. There are many who are trying and finding that it works for them.

On the 1st of July the will be a hearing at Leyalnd Magistrates for SOUTH RIBBLE BOROUGH COUNCIL v MICHAEL THOMAS DOBSON. For those of you who are diligently studying and would benefit from some first hand experience of the application of the ideas talked about here and else where on the interent, you may wish to attend!!!

May paece be with you

Mike

[deadbeatdad]

I have just been informed by Roger Hayes that he appeared in court for council tax, he interupted the courts as the Council Solicitors were going through the bulk reference of numbers and getting Liability Orders rubber stamped, he asked to speak to their solicitor, they asked asked him for his name which he responded " you can call me Roger I am a third Party agent for Roger Hayes. They accepted this and he informed them that the council tax bill does not conform to the Bill Of Exchange Act and pointed out where the bill is illegal.
They went back into court and Roger managed to get 900 cases squashed due to the illegal activity of the council. This is brilliant news folks the fight back is on WE ARE STARTING TO WIN

[Malcolm Ramsay]

I have just been informed by Roger Hayes that he appeared in court for council tax, he interupted the courts as the Council Solicitors were going through the bulk reference of numbers and getting Liability Orders rubber stamped, he asked to speak to their solicitor, they asked asked him for his name which he responded " you can call me Roger I am a third Party agent for Roger Hayes. They accepted this and he informed them that the council tax bill does not conform to the Bill Of Exchange Act and pointed out where the bill is illegal.
They went back into court and Roger managed to get 900 cases squashed due to the illegal activity of the council. This is brilliant news folks the fight back is on WE ARE STARTING TO WIN

This is interesting .... any chance of some more details? What did he point to to show that the Bill of Exchange Act was relevant? And were the cases dismissed by the magistrate or withdrawn by the solicitor?

[ziggy]

yes, very interesting, tell me more please. im doing some stuff with my local council so any info would be great. well done anyway.